Comparison of Cartesian and Non-Cartesian Real-Time MRI Sequences at 1.5T to Assess Velar Motion and Velopharyngeal Closure during Speech

Dynamic imaging of the vocal tract using real-time MRI has been an active and growing area of research, having demonstrated great potential to become routinely performed in the clinical evaluation of speech and swallowing disorders. Although many technical advances have been made in regards to acquisition and reconstruction methodologies, there is still no consensus in best practice protocols. This study aims to compare Cartesian and non-Cartesian real-time MRI sequences, regarding image quality and temporal resolution trade-off, for dynamic speech imaging. Five subjects were imaged at 1.5T, while performing normal phonation, in order to assess velar motion and velopharyngeal closure. Data was acquired using both Cartesian and non-Cartesian (spiral and radial) real-time sequences at five different spatial-temporal resolution sets, between 10 fps (1.7×1.7×10 mm3) and 25 fps (1.5×1.5×10 mm3). Only standard scanning resources provided by the MRI scanner manufacturer were used to ensure easy applicability to clinical evaluation and reproducibility. Data sets were evaluated by comparing measurements of the velar structure, dynamic contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality visual scoring. Results showed that for all proposed sequences, FLASH spiral acquisitions provided higher contrast-to-noise ratio, up to a 170.34% increase at 20 fps, than equivalent bSSFP Cartesian acquisitions for the same spatial-temporal resolution. At higher frame rates (22 and 25 fps), spiral protocols were optimal and provided higher CNR and visual scoring than equivalent radial protocols. Comparison of dynamic imaging at 10 and 22 fps for radial and spiral acquisitions revealed no significant difference in CNR performance, thus indicating that temporal resolution can be doubled without compromising spatial resolution (1.9×1.9 mm2) or CNR. In summary, this study suggests that the use of FLASH spiral protocols should be preferred over bSSFP Cartesian for the dynamic imaging of velopharyngeal closure, as it allows for an improvement in CNR and overall image quality without compromising spatial-temporal resolution.

[1]  K. Nimkin,et al.  Feasibility study to assess clinical applications of 3-T cine MRI coupled with synchronous audio recording during speech in evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[2]  C. Drissi,et al.  Feasibility of dynamic MRI for evaluating velopharyngeal insufficiency in children , 2011, European Radiology.

[3]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  An approach to real-time magnetic resonance imaging for speech production. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Marzena Wylezinska,et al.  Evaluating velopharyngeal closure with real-time MRI , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  Marzena Wylezinska,et al.  Speech MRI: morphology and function. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[6]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of swallowing and laryngeal motion using parallel imaging at 3 T. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Vocal tract in female registers--a dynamic real-time MRI study. , 2010, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[8]  Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini,et al.  TrueFisp versus HASTE sequences in 3T cine MRI: Evaluation of image quality during phonation in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency , 2015, European Radiology.

[9]  R. Boubertakh,et al.  Towards clinical assessment of velopharyngeal closure using MRI: evaluation of real-time MRI sequences at 1.5 and 3 T. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  Paralinguistic mechanisms of production in human "beatboxing": a real-time magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Jamie L Perry,et al.  Variations in Velopharyngeal Structures between Upright and Supine Positions Using Upright Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[12]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  An investigation of articulatory setting using real-time magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Sara Howard,et al.  Instrumentation in the Analysis of the Structure and Function of the Velopharyngeal Mechanism , 2013 .

[15]  Charles A Conway,et al.  Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Velopharyngeal Activities with Simultaneous Speech Recordings , 2011, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[16]  G. Henningsson,et al.  Comparison between multiview videofluoroscopy and nasendoscopy of velopharyngeal movements. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[17]  Didier Demolin,et al.  Real-time MRI and articulatory coordination in speech. , 2002, Comptes rendus biologies.

[18]  Johan Sundberg,et al.  Vocal tract and register changes analysed by real-time MRI in male professional singers—a pilot study , 2008, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[19]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Acceleration of MRI of the vocal tract provides additional insight into articulator modifications , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Kuehn Dp,et al.  A cineradiographic investigation of velar movement variables in two normals. , 1976 .

[21]  T. Hohage,et al.  Image reconstruction by regularized nonlinear inversion—Joint estimation of coil sensitivities and image content , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Hans Dotevall,et al.  Evaluation of VPI-assessment with videofluoroscopy and nasoendoscopy. , 2005, British journal of plastic surgery.

[23]  Robert Sader,et al.  Dynamic near‐real‐time magnetic resonance imaging for analyzing the velopharyngeal closure in comparison with videofluoroscopy , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  D P Kuehn,et al.  A cineradiographic investigation of velar movement variables in two normals. , 1976, The Cleft palate journal.

[25]  Bénédicte M A Delattre,et al.  Spiral demystified. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Marc E Miquel,et al.  Recommendations for real‐time speech MRI , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Real‐time MRI of speaking at a resolution of 33 ms: Undersampled radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  R C Grimm,et al.  Real‐time interactive magnetic resonance imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Cine magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous audio to evaluate pediatric velopharyngeal insufficiency. , 2011, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[30]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  High-resolution dynamic speech imaging with deformation estimation , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[31]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  A fast and flexible MRI system for the study of dynamic vocal tract shaping , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Ravi Seethamraju,et al.  Faster dynamic imaging of speech with field inhomogeneity corrected spiral fast low angle shot (FLASH) at 3 T , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.