Real-time distributed hybrid testing

SUMMARY Large-scale testing and qualification of structural systems and their components is crucial for the development of earthquake engineering knowledge and practice. However, laboratory capacity is often limited when attempting larger experiments due to the sheer size of the structures involved. To overcome traditional laboratory capacity limitations, we present a new earthquake engineering testing method: real-time distributed hybrid testing. Extending current approaches, the technique enables geographically distributed scientific equipment including controllers, dynamic actuators and sensors to be coupled across the Internet in real-time. As a result, hybrid structural emulations consisting of physical and numerical substructures need no longer be limited to a single laboratory. Larger experiments may distribute substructures across laboratories located in different cities whilst maintaining correct dynamic coupling, required to accurately capture physical rate effects. The various aspects of the distributed testing environment have been considered. In particular, to ensure accurate control across an environment not designed for real-time testing, new higher level control protocols are introduced acting over an optimised communication system. New large time-step prediction algorithms are used, capable of overcoming both local actuation and distributed system delays. An overview of the architecture and algorithms developed is presented together with results demonstrating a number of current capabilities. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  UK-NEES: grid services architecture for earthquake , 2008 .

[2]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing , 2008 .

[3]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Test Method—Current Status and Future Directions , 1989 .

[4]  Yuan-Sen Yang,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part I: Database approach , 2007 .

[5]  Peng Pan,et al.  Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test‐analysis domains , 2005 .

[6]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Stability and Delay Compensation for Real-Time Substructure Testing , 2002 .

[7]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hybrid Seismic Response Simulation on a Geographically Distributed Bridge Model , 2008 .

[8]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Compensation of actuator dynamics in real-time hybrid tests , 2007 .

[9]  Antony Darby,et al.  The development of real–time substructure testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Andrew Plummer,et al.  Control techniques for structural testing: A review , 2007 .

[11]  Mobin Ojaghi Development of the UK-NEES test middleware, early tests, web services approach, network usage, security, and usability issues in distributed hybrid testing , 2011 .

[12]  Artur Pinto Large Scale Testing , 2010 .

[13]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part II: The application protocol approach , 2007 .

[14]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  REAL-TIME SUBSTRUCTURE TESTS USING HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR , 1999 .

[15]  Ning Xi,et al.  Cooperative teleoperation of a multirobot system with force reflection via Internet , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Makoto Ohsaki,et al.  Development of peer‐to‐peer (P2P) internet online hybrid test system , 2006 .

[17]  Bozidar Stojadinovic,et al.  Time Step Optimization For Distributed Hybrid Simulation Between University Of California – Berkeley And University Of Auckland , 2010 .

[18]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[19]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Development and model-based transparency analysis of an Internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform , 2011 .

[20]  M. Nakashima,et al.  Japanese Activities on On‐Line Testing , 1987 .

[21]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Software framework for distributed experimental–computational simulation of structural systems , 2006 .

[22]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Reconfiguring practice: the interdependence of experimental procedure and computing infrastructure in distributed earthquake engineering , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  TECHNICAL NOTE A FRAMEWORK FOR MULTI-SITE DISTRIBUTED SIMULATION AND APPLICATION TO COMPLEX STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[24]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems , 2012 .