Aspects of material removal mechanism in plain waterjet milling on gamma titanium aluminide

Abstract Due to providing reduced mechanical and thermal damages to workpiece surfaces, waterjet machining that is one of the most promising non-conventional processing methods found its niche application in cutting/shaping of materials with low machinability indexes. It can be even a more attracting technology if plain waterjet (PWJ) milling is employed due to reduced running costs (absence of abrasives) and the elimination of surface contaminations (grit embedment). The paper reports for the first time PWJ milling of a notoriously difficult-to-cut material, gamma titanium aluminide (γ-TiAl). Trials of different jet paths with varied milling parameters (e.g. water-hammer pressures, stepovers, number of passes) were conducted for understanding the removal mechanism of γ-TiAl in plain waterjet milling. The findings showed that the threshold water-hammer pressure for eroding the target material and for achieving uniform erosion were in the vicinity of 800 MPa and greater than 1 GPa, respectively. In addition, different fracture modes were observed on γ-TiAl when PWJ milling: (i) plastic deformation and crack initiation; (ii) stress wave propagation; (iii) micropits due to joint of crack lines; (iv) intergranular cracking/fracture, triple split and interlamellar/translamellar fracture. The stages (i)–(iii) occurred at lower water-hammer pressures and number of passes while the subsequent stage (iv) was only observed at higher water-hammer pressures or number of passes. The knowledge accumulated when studying the material removal mechanism and surface morphology enabled successful generation of 3D PWJ milled features (e.g. shallow pocket). To evaluate the capability of PWJ milling process, the geometrical accuracy and surface quality of the pocket has been examined. Finally, the advantages and drawbacks of the PWJ milling process are discussed to allow the definition where the technology is economically viable.

[1]  R. Cao,et al.  Effects of loading rate on damage and fracture behavior of TiAl alloys , 2007 .

[2]  D. Aspinwall,et al.  Surface integrity and fatigue life of turned gamma titanium aluminide , 1997 .

[3]  J. Bitter A study of erosion phenomena part I , 1963 .

[4]  D. Aspinwall,et al.  Workpiece surface integrity considerations when finish turning gamma titanium aluminide , 2001 .

[5]  Neil A. Kelson,et al.  A study of abrasive water jet characteristics by CFD simulation , 2004 .

[6]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Characteristics of the surface of a titanium alloy following milling with abrasive waterjets , 2005 .

[7]  M. Hashish A Modeling Study of Metal Cutting With Abrasive Waterjets , 1984 .

[8]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  An Analytical and Experimental Study of Cleaning With Moving Waterjets , 1998 .

[9]  J. E. Field,et al.  ELSI conference: invited lecture: Liquid impact: theory, experiment, applications , 1999 .

[10]  C. Chen,et al.  The fracture mechanism of a fully lamellar γ-TiAl alloy through in-situ SEM observation , 2000 .

[11]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  The effects of machined workpiece surface integrity on the fatigue life of γ-titanium aluminide , 2001 .

[12]  C. A. van Luttervelt,et al.  An experimental investigation of rectangular pocket milling with abrasive water jet , 1998 .

[13]  Herbert Herman,et al.  Treatise on Materials Science and Technology , 1979 .

[14]  H. I. Epstein,et al.  Handbook of Mechanics, Materials, and Structures , 1986 .

[15]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  A technical note on grit embedment following abrasive water-jet milling of a titanium alloy , 2005 .

[16]  J. Bitter,et al.  A study of erosion phenomena , 1963 .

[17]  Wang Jia-dao,et al.  Damages on steel surface at the incubation stage of the vibration cavitation erosion in water , 2008 .

[18]  Vydehi Arun Joshi,et al.  Titanium Alloys: An Atlas of Structures and Fracture Features , 2006 .

[19]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  Reciprocating surface grinding of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic alloy , 2001 .

[20]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Fracture of brittle multiphase materials by high energy water jets , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[21]  Neelesh Kumar Jain,et al.  Modeling of material removal in mechanical type advanced machining processes: a state-of-art review , 2001 .

[22]  Tarek Mabrouki,et al.  Numerical simulation and experimental study of the interaction between a pure high-velocity waterjet and targets : contribution to investigate the decoating process , 2000 .

[23]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Statistical character of the failure of multiphase materials due to high pressure water jet impingement , 1995 .

[24]  R. Kinslow,et al.  Pressure due to high-velocity impact of a water jet , 1976 .

[25]  Thomas Ephraim Brock,et al.  First International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology , 1972 .

[26]  R. Mirshams,et al.  High-temperature tensile properties and fracture characteristics in a monolithic gamma TiAl alloy and a TiB2 particle-reinforced TiAl alloy , 1997 .

[27]  John E. Field,et al.  Liquid-jet impact on liquid and solid surfaces , 1995 .

[28]  D Clifton,et al.  Electrochemical machining of gamma titanium aluminide intermetallics , 2001 .