The Need to Adapt and Its Implications for Embodiment

We present the hypothesis that an important factor for the choice of a particular embodiment for a natural or artificial agent is the effect of the embodiment on the agent’s ability to adapt to changes in the environment. To support this hypothesis, we discuss recent empirical results where sensor morphology was found to significantly affect the time needed for learning a given task. Also, we discuss other recent experiments where a unique optimal sensor morphology could be evolved simply by requiring that the agent had to learn its task as quickly as possible. Both these findings are explained by the recently discovered ”Principle of Unique Local Gain Factors for Optimal Adaptation” which provides a first step towards a general mathematical setting for understanding the interdependence between an agent’s embodiment and its learning performance.

[1]  R. Salomon,et al.  The evolution of an artificial compound eye by using adaptive hardware , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[2]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1997 .

[3]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[4]  Lukas Lichtensteiger Towards optimal sensor morphology for specific tasks: evolution of an artificial compound eye for estimating time to contact , 2000, SPIE Optics East.

[5]  R. Hardie,et al.  Facets of Vision , 1989, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[6]  P. Eggenberger,et al.  Evolving the morphology of a compound eye on a robot , 1999, 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot'99). Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX355).

[7]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Morpho-functional machines : the new species : designing embodied intelligence , 2003 .

[8]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Variations in the Structure and Design of Compound Eyes , 1989 .

[9]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[10]  David C. Sterratt,et al.  Does Morphology Influence Temporal Plasticity? , 2002, ICANN.

[11]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[12]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  An Optimal Sensor Morphology Improves Adaptability of Neural Network Controllers , 2002, ICANN.

[14]  Lukas Lichtensteiger Evolving Task Specific Optimal Morphologies for an Artificial Insect Eye , 2003 .

[15]  Paul S. Schenker,et al.  Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems , 1999 .