Hierarchical Dynamical Information Systems With a Focus on Biology

A system of a number of relatively stable units that can combine more or less freely to form somewhat less stable structures has a capacity to carry information in a more or less arbitrary way. I call such a system a physical information system if its properties are dynamically specified. All physical information systems have certain general dynamical properties. DNA can form such a system, but so can, to a lesser degree, RNA, proteins, cells and cellular subsystems, various immune system elements, organisms in populations and in ecosystems, as well as other higher-level phenomena. These systems are hierarchical structures with respect to the expression of lower level information at higher levels. This allows a distinction between macro and microstates within the system, with resulting statistical (entropy driven) dynamics, including the possibility of self-organization, system bifurcation, and the formation of higher levels of information expression. Although lower-level information is expressed in an information hierarchy, this in itself is not sufficient for reference, function, or meaning. Nonetheless, the expression of information is central to the realization of all of these. 'Biological information' is thus ambiguous between syntactic information in a hierarchical modular system, and functional information. However, the dynamics of hierarchical physical information systems is of interest to the study of how functional information might be embodied physically. I will address 1) how to tighten the relative terms in the characterizations of 'information system' and 'informational hierarchy' above, 2) how to distinguish between components of an information system combining to form more complex informational modules and the expression of information, 3) some aspects of the dynamics of such systems that are of biological interest, 4) why information expression in such systems is not sufficient for functional information, and 5) what further might be required for functional information.

[1]  D. Brooks Evolution in the Information Age: Rediscovering the Nature of the Organism , 2001 .

[2]  D. Brooks Taking Evolutionary Transitions Seriously , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel M. Dubois,et al.  Autonomy in Anticipatory Systems : Significance for Functionality , Intentionality and Meaning , 1998 .

[4]  J. Collier Information Originates in Symmetry Breaking , 1996 .

[5]  Howard Hunt Pattee,et al.  Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems , 1973 .

[6]  N. Boyce Life itself , 2018, The Lancet.

[7]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Victims of History—A Nonequilibrium Approach to Evolution , 1982 .

[8]  Lila L. Gatlin,et al.  Information theory and the living system , 1972 .

[9]  D. Brooks The Nature of the Organism: Life Has a Life of Its Own , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. Collier,et al.  The Dynamical Basis of Emergence in Natural Hierarchies , 1998 .

[11]  Jack Maze,et al.  Studies into abstract properties of individuals . V . An empirical study of emergence in ontogeny and phylogeny in Achnatherum nelsonii , .

[12]  A. Kolmogorov Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information , 1968 .

[13]  Joseph Romeo William Michael Picard,et al.  Impredicativity and turn of the century foundations of mathematics : presupposition in poincare and russell , 1993 .

[14]  Gertrudis Van de Vijver,et al.  Closure : emergent organizations and their dynamics , 2000 .

[15]  Daniel M. Dubois COMPUTING ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS: CASYS 2001 - Fifth International Conference , 2002 .

[16]  J. Collier Intrinsic Information , 1990 .

[17]  J. Collier,et al.  Supervenience and Reduction in Biological Hierarchies , 1988 .

[18]  J. Collier Entropy in evolution , 1986 .

[19]  John Collier,et al.  CAUSATION IS THE TRANSFER OF INFORMATION , 1999 .

[20]  J. Bregetzer [The liar]. , 1989, Revue de l'infirmiere.

[21]  Jon Barwise,et al.  Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems , 1997 .

[22]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems , 1999 .

[23]  J. Maze,et al.  Studies into abstract properties of individuals. VI. The degree of emergence in individuals, populations, species and a three species lineage. , 2001, Bio Systems.

[24]  Stanley N. Salthe,et al.  Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology , 1993 .

[25]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[26]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Evolution as entropy: Toward a unified theory of biology , 1987 .

[27]  J. Collier,et al.  Autonomy and Process Closure as the Basis for Functionality , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Collier,et al.  Information Increase in Biological Systems: How Does Adaptation Fit? , 1998 .

[29]  Andrei N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Logical basis for information theory and probability theory , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[30]  John Collier,et al.  THE DYNAMICAL BASIS OF INFORMATION AND THE ORIGINS OF SEMIOSIS , 2000 .

[31]  John Collier,et al.  Dealing with the Unexpected , 2001 .

[32]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Information, mechanism and meaning , 1969 .

[33]  Werner Holzmüller Information in Biological Systems: The Role of Macromolecules , 1984 .

[34]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Essays on Life Itself , 1999 .

[35]  Jonathan D. H. Smith Canonical Ensembles, Evolution of Competing Species, and the Arrow of Time , 1998 .

[36]  M. Conrad Evolving hierarchical systems: Stanley N. Salthe, Columbia University Press, New York, 1985, 343pp. (US$32.50) , 1987 .

[37]  John Collier,et al.  What is Autonomy , 2002 .

[38]  John Collier Information theory as a general language for functional systems , 2001 .