Enhanced Archaerhodopsin Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicators

A longstanding goal in neuroscience has been to develop techniques for imaging the voltage dynamics of genetically defined subsets of neurons. Optical sensors of transmembrane voltage would enhance studies of neural activity in contexts ranging from individual neurons cultured in vitro to neuronal populations in awake-behaving animals. Recent progress has identified Archaerhodopsin (Arch) based sensors as a promising, genetically encoded class of fluorescent voltage indicators that can report single action potentials. Wild-type Arch exhibits sub-millisecond fluorescence responses to trans-membrane voltage, but its light-activated proton pump also responds to the imaging illumination. An Arch mutant (Arch-D95N) exhibits no photocurrent, but has a slower, ~40 ms response to voltage transients. Here we present Arch-derived voltage sensors with trafficking signals that enhance their localization to the neural membrane. We also describe Arch mutant sensors (Arch-EEN and -EEQ) that exhibit faster kinetics and greater fluorescence dynamic range than Arch-D95N, and no photocurrent at the illumination intensities normally used for imaging. We benchmarked these voltage sensors regarding their spike detection fidelity by using a signal detection theoretic framework that takes into account the experimentally measured photon shot noise and optical waveforms for single action potentials. This analysis revealed that by combining the sequence mutations and enhanced trafficking sequences, the new sensors improved the fidelity of spike detection by nearly three-fold in comparison to Arch-D95N.

[1]  W. N. Ross,et al.  Optical recording of neuronal activity in an invertebrate central nervous system: simultaneous monitoring of several neurons. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  H. Khorana,et al.  Replacement of aspartic residues 85, 96, 115, or 212 affects the quantum yield and kinetics of proton release and uptake by bacteriorhodopsin. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Lanyi,et al.  Proton transfer and energy coupling in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle , 1992, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.

[4]  F Bezanilla,et al.  Microsecond response of a voltage-sensitive merocyanine dye: fast voltage-clamp measurements on squid giant axon. , 1993, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Ryan,et al.  Foot‐and‐mouth disease virus 2A oligopeptide mediated cleavage of an artificial polyprotein. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[6]  H. Khorana,et al.  Intramolecular charge transfer in the bacteriorhodopsin mutants Asp85-->Asn and Asp212-->Asn: effects of pH and anions. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[7]  P. Kolodner,et al.  Electric-field-induced Schiff-base deprotonation in D85N mutant bacteriorhodopsin. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Kaulen,et al.  Cl−‐dependent photovoltage responses of bacteriorhodopsin: comparison of the D85T and D85S mutants and wild‐type acid purple form , 1997, FEBS letters.

[9]  Ehud Y Isacoff,et al.  A Genetically Encoded Optical Probe of Membrane Voltage , 1997, Neuron.

[10]  M. Greenberg,et al.  EphA Receptors Regulate Growth Cone Dynamics through the Novel Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Ephexin , 2001, Cell.

[11]  T. Knöpfel,et al.  Design and characterization of a DNA‐encoded, voltage‐sensitive fluorescent protein , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  Amiram Grinvald,et al.  VSDI: a new era in functional imaging of cortical dynamics , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Smaroula Dilioglou,et al.  Correction of multi-gene deficiency in vivo using a single 'self-cleaving' 2A peptide–based retroviral vector , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Francisco Bezanilla,et al.  A hybrid approach to measuring electrical activity in genetically specified neurons , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Fakler,et al.  Selective Golgi export of Kir2.1 controls the stoichiometry of functional Kir2.x channel heteromers , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  eNpHR: a Natronomonas halorhodopsin enhanced for optogenetic applications , 2008, Brain cell biology.

[18]  G. Miesenböck,et al.  Rational Optimization and Imaging In Vivo of a Genetically Encoded Optical Voltage Reporter , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Yasushi Okamura,et al.  Improving membrane voltage measurements using FRET with new fluorescent proteins , 2008, Nature Methods.

[20]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Engineering of a Genetically Encodable Fluorescent Voltage Sensor Exploiting Fast Ci-VSP Voltage-Sensing Movements , 2008, PloS one.

[21]  Thomas Knöpfel,et al.  Red-shifted voltage-sensitive fluorescent proteins. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[22]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Spectrally-Resolved Response Properties of the Three Most Advanced FRET Based Fluorescent Protein Voltage Probes , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Imaging brain electric signals with genetically targeted voltage-sensitive fluorescent proteins , 2010, Nature Methods.

[24]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Biophysical characterization of the fluorescent protein voltage probe VSFP2.3 based on the voltage-sensing domain of Ci-VSP , 2010, European Biophysics Journal.

[25]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Approaches for Diversifying and Extending Optogenetics , 2010, Cell.

[26]  F. Chavane,et al.  Voltage-sensitive dye imaging: Technique review and models , 2010, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[27]  Michael A. Henninger,et al.  High-Performance Genetically Targetable Optical Neural Silencing via Light-Driven Proton Pumps , 2010 .

[28]  Site-directed mutagenesis in bacteriorhodopsin mutants and their characterization for bioelectrical and biotechnological equipment , 2012, Biotechnology Letters.

[29]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Imaging Voltage in Neurons , 2011, Neuron.

[30]  Adam E. Cohen,et al.  Electrical Spiking in Escherichia coli Probed with a Fluorescent Voltage-Indicating Protein , 2011, Science.

[31]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins , 2011, Nature Methods.

[32]  Jasper Akerboom,et al.  Optimization of a GCaMP Calcium Indicator for Neural Activity Imaging , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Genetically engineered fluorescent voltage reporters. , 2012, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[34]  Vincent A. Pieribone,et al.  Single Action Potentials and Subthreshold Electrical Events Imaged in Neurons with a Fluorescent Protein Voltage Probe , 2012, Neuron.

[35]  Thomas Knöpfel,et al.  Transfer of Kv3.1 voltage sensor features to the isolated Ci-VSP voltage-sensing domain. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Walther Akemann,et al.  Imaging neural circuit dynamics with a voltage-sensitive fluorescent protein. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins , 2012, Nature Methods.

[38]  V. Pieribone,et al.  A Fluorescent, Genetically-Encoded Voltage Probe Capable of Resolving Action Potentials , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  D. Maclaurin,et al.  Optical recording of action potentials in mammalian neurons using a microbial rhodopsin , 2011, Nature Methods.

[40]  James E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Photon shot noise limits on optical detection of neuronal spikes and estimation of spike timing. , 2013, Biophysical journal.