Management Insights from Great and Struggling Family Businesses

The common perception of family-controlled businesses (FCBs) is that they are subject to stagnation, clannishness, cronyism and rash leadership. Yet many FCBs are highly successful. This paper is based on a study of 46 successful and 24 struggling FCBs to determine how they differed in their strategic, organisational and leadership priorities. It identifies four main priorities which it calls “the 4 Cs”: continuity, community, connections and command. Each of these priorities contains advantages, but they also have their downsides. While the successful FCBs effectively exploited the Cs, the unsuccessful companies manifested these priorities and practices less frequently, and fell victim to their negative aspects. Citing examples of FCBs, this paper offers an analysis of each of the 4C priorities and the lessons that can be applied to FCBs and non-family companies.

[1]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms , 2003 .

[2]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[3]  S. Zahra.  International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement , 2003 .

[4]  Manuel Núñez-Nickel,et al.  The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts , 2001 .

[5]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings , 2002 .

[6]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[7]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Harnessing diversity and collective action in the top management team , 2004 .

[8]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  Agency Problems in Large Family Business Groups , 2003 .

[9]  Ronald C. Anderson,et al.  Board Composition: Balancing Family Influence in S&P 500 Firms , 2004 .

[10]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[11]  Roberts T. Jones,et al.  TQM Adoption Practices in the Family-Owned Business , 1996 .

[12]  Ronald C. Anderson,et al.  Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2003 .

[13]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Challengers, Elites, and Owning Families: A Social Class Theory of Corporate Acquisitions in the 1960s , 2001 .

[14]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification , 1999 .

[15]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence , 2001 .