Venture team human capital and absorptive capacity in high technology new ventures

In high technology environments, rapid technological change means that the value of a firm's existing knowledge is quickly eroded. In order to acquire needed capabilities, high technology new ventures engage in venturing strategies such as acquisitions and joint ventures. The top management team is an important source of inherited knowledge for these ventures and therefore influences their absorptive capacity. We hypothesise that high technology new ventures' ability to learn through venturing activities is influenced by their top management teams' human capital. This study analyses the human capital characteristics of the top management teams of 340 high technology new ventures from the USA. It is found that human capital diversity of the top management teams moderates the relationship between venturing activities and innovation and financial performance in these ventures. In contrast, the level of human capital has no effect. The implications for management practice and future research are discussed.

[1]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[3]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Goverance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities , 1996 .

[4]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[5]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[6]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[7]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[8]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings , 1994 .

[9]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  The advantage chain: Antecedents to rents from internal corporate ventures , 1994 .

[10]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[11]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Solution Diversity and the Quality of Groups Decisions , 1986 .

[12]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Strategies of high performing new and small firms: A reexamination of the niche concept , 1986 .

[13]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[14]  A. Gambardella.  Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[15]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[16]  Eric D. Beinhocker.  Robust Adaptive Strategies , 1999 .

[17]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[18]  Xielin Liu,et al.  The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries , 1997 .

[19]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[20]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[21]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[22]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The role of strategic alliances in high‐technology new product development , 1995 .

[23]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[24]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[25]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[26]  Allan P. Jones,et al.  Apples and Oranges: An Empirical Comparison of Commonly Used Indices of Interrater Agreement , 1983 .

[27]  M. Dowling,et al.  Using R&D cooperative arrangements to leverage managerial experience: A study of technology-intensive new ventures , 1994 .

[28]  Richard W. Woodman,et al.  Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective. , 1989 .

[29]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[30]  Eric S. Rosengren,et al.  The poor performance of foreign bank subsidiaries : were the problems acquired or created? , 1999 .

[31]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[32]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[33]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[34]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[35]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[36]  P. N. SubbaNarasimha,et al.  Technological knowledge and firm performance of pharmaceutical firms , 2003 .

[37]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[38]  Paul G. Simmonds,et al.  The combined diversification breadth and mode dimensions and the performance of large diversified firms , 1990 .

[39]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[40]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in a Transition Economy: Learning-by-Doing and Learning Myopia , 2002 .

[41]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[42]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[43]  S. Zahra.  Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach , 1993 .

[44]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[45]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[46]  A. Koestler.  The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[47]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1997 .

[48]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[50]  F. Kodama.  Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .

[51]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .