Emergence of V1 connectivity pattern and Hebbian rule in a performance-optimized artificial neural network

The connectivity pattern and function of the recurrent connections in the primary visual cortex (V1) have been studied for a long time. But the underlying mechanism remains elusive. We hypothesize that the recurrent connectivity is a result of performance optimization in recognizing images. To test this idea, we added recurrent connections within the first convolutional layer in a standard convolutional neural network, mimicking the recurrent connections in the V1, then trained the network for image classification using the back-propagation algorithm. We found that the trained connectivity pattern was similar to those discovered in biological experiments. According to their connectivity, the neurons were categorized into simple and complex neurons. The recurrent synaptic weight between two simple neurons is determined by the inner product of their receptive fields, which is consistent with the Hebbian rule. Functionally, the recurrent connections linearly amplify the feedforward inputs to simple neurons and determine the properties of complex neurons. The agreement between the model results and biological findings suggests that it is possible to use deep learning to further our understanding of the connectome.

[1]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes , 2017, NIPS.

[2]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[4]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[5]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence , 2017, Neuron.

[6]  Chengxu Zhuang,et al.  Deep Learning Predicts Correlation between a Functional Signature of Higher Visual Areas and Sparse Firing of Neurons , 2017, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[7]  Wu Li,et al.  Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[9]  Brett J. Graham,et al.  Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex , 2016, Nature.

[10]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[11]  Guangyu R. Yang,et al.  Training Excitatory-Inhibitory Recurrent Neural Networks for Cognitive Tasks: A Simple and Flexible Framework , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  H. Adesnik,et al.  A neural circuit for spatial summation in visual cortex , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Ha Hong,et al.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits , 1995, Science.

[18]  D. R. Muir,et al.  Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex , 2015, Nature.

[19]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patterns of excitation and inhibition evoked by horizontal connections in visual cortex share a common relationship to orientation columns , 1995, Neuron.

[21]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Bridging the Gaps Between Residual Learning, Recurrent Neural Networks and Visual Cortex , 2016, ArXiv.

[22]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks , 2011, Nature.

[23]  Xiaolin Hu,et al.  Recurrent convolutional neural network for object recognition , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[24]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  A Neural Model of Contour Integration in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1998, Neural Computation.

[25]  C. Clopath,et al.  The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex , 2013, Nature.

[26]  J. Nelson,et al.  Intracortical facilitation among co-oriented, co-axially aligned simple cells in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Recurrent convolutional neural networks: a better model of biological object recognition under occlusion , 2017 .

[28]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  Linear Transformation of Thalamocortical input by Intracortical Excitation , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[31]  W Singer,et al.  The Perceptual Grouping Criterion of Colinearity is Reflected by Anisotropies of Connections in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Context-enabled learning in the human visual system , 2002, Nature.