The sediment delivery problem revisited

Understanding the sediment delivery process at the drainage basin scale remains a challenge in erosion and sedimentation research. In the absence of reliable spatially distributed process-based models for the prediction of sediment transport at the drainage basin scale, area-specific sediment yield (SSY; t km—2 y—1) is often assumed to decrease with increasing drainage basin area (A). As the measurement of A is relatively simple, this assumption is frequently used for prediction of SSY in ungauged basins. However, over the last two decades several studies reported a positive or non-linear relation between A and SSY. Various authors have suggested diverse explanations for these opposing trends. This paper provides an overview of the different observed trends and summarizes the explanations for each trend. Furthermore, three typical trends are identified to conceptualize the main driving forces of the relation between A and SSY. First of all, it is emphasized that erosion and sediment deposition processes are scale dependent, and going from small (km2) erosion rates generally decrease and deposition in sediment sinks increases due to decreasing slope gradients, and so SSY decreases with increasing A. Next, land-cover conditions and human impact determine if hillslope erosion is dominant over channel erosion or vice versa. In the first case, SSY is expected to decrease with increasing A, while in the latter case SSY will show a continuous positive relation with A. Only for very large areas (A > ~104 km2) a decrease in SSY is observed when drainage density decreases or channel banks are stabilized. Finally, spatial patterns in lithology, land cover, climate or topography can cause SSY to increase or decrease at any basin area and can therefore result in non-linear relations with A. Altogether, with increasing A often first a rise and then a decrease in SSY is observed. The decrease can be absent or can be postponed within a region due to local factors of which lithology, land cover, climate and topography are the most important ones. The large regional, local and even temporal variability in the trend between A and SSY implies that prediction of SSY based on A alone is troublesome and preferably spatially distributed information on land use, climate, lithology, topography and dominant erosion processes is required.

[1]  Hao Chen,et al.  Scale effect on sediment yield from sloping surfaces to basins in hilly loess region on the Loess Plateau in China , 2007 .

[2]  E. Arnau-Rosalén,et al.  Causes and underlying processes of measurement variability in field erosion plots in Mediterranean conditions , 2007 .

[3]  O. Slaymaker Towards the identification of scaling relations in drainage basin sediment budgets , 2006 .

[4]  J. Poesen,et al.  Reservoir and Pond Sedimentation in Europe , 2006 .

[5]  John Wainwright,et al.  Scale relationships in hillslope runoff and erosion , 2006 .

[6]  Carolina Boix-Fayos,et al.  Measuring soil erosion by field plots: understanding the sources of variation , 2006 .

[7]  Ian P. Prosser,et al.  Modelling sediment delivery ratio over the Murray Darling Basin , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  D. M. Powell,et al.  Is sediment delivery a fallacy? , 2006 .

[9]  Anton Van Rompaey,et al.  Predicting catchment sediment yield in Mediterranean environments: the importance of sediment sources and connectivity in Italian drainage basins , 2006 .

[10]  James C. Bathurst,et al.  Model study of the relationship between sediment yield and river basin area , 2006 .

[11]  Jan Nyssen,et al.  Reservoirs in Tigray (Northern Ethiopia): characteristics and sediment deposition problems , 2006 .

[12]  B. Kjerfve,et al.  Factors controlling sediment yield in a major South American drainage basin: the Magdalena River, Colombia , 2006 .

[13]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  GIS-based sediment assessment tool , 2005 .

[14]  M. Rǎdoane,et al.  Dams, sediment sources and reservoir silting in Romania , 2005 .

[15]  W. Renwick,et al.  The role of impoundments in the sediment budget of the conterminous United States , 2005 .

[16]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  A theoretical exploration of catchment‐scale sediment delivery , 2005 .

[17]  D. Knight,et al.  A review of the measurement of sediment yield in different scales , 2005 .

[18]  J. Poesen,et al.  Characteristics, controlling factors and importance of deep gullies under cropland on loess-derived soils , 2005 .

[19]  Jan Nyssen,et al.  Specific sediment yield in Tigray-Northern Ethiopia: Assessment and semi-quantitative modelling , 2005 .

[20]  X. Jiong-xin,et al.  Scale effects on specific sediment yield in the Yellow River basin and geomorphological explanations , 2005 .

[21]  J. Poesen,et al.  Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: Scale issues and semi-quantitative models , 2005 .

[22]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean , 2005, Science.

[23]  John Wainwright,et al.  A conceptual model for determining soil erosion by water , 2004 .

[24]  J. López‐Moreno,et al.  Temporal and spatial interactions of slope and catchment processes in the Central Spanish Pyrenees , 2004 .

[25]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Predicting the terrestrial flux of sediment to the global ocean: a planetary perspective , 2003 .

[26]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A review of erosion and sediment transport models , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  B. Menounos,et al.  Advances in Holocene mountain geomorphology inspired by sediment budget methodology , 2003 .

[28]  A. C. Imeson,et al.  Runoff generation, sediment movement and soil water behaviour on calcareous (limestone) slopes of some mediterranean environment s in southeast Spain s , 2003 .

[29]  Chris S. Renschler,et al.  Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales—the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation , 2002 .

[30]  A. Brath,et al.  Assessing the effects of land-use changes on annual average gross erosion , 2002 .

[31]  J. Poesen,et al.  Factors controlling sediment yield from small intensively cultivated catchments in a temperate humid climate , 2001 .

[32]  Michael Hofmockel,et al.  Spatial patterns of suspended sediment yields in a humid tropical watershed in Costa Rica , 2001 .

[33]  J. G. King,et al.  Mountain erosion over 10 yr, 10 k.y., and 10 m.y. time scales , 2001 .

[34]  N. Hovius,et al.  Large-scale erosion rates from in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides in European river sediments , 2001 .

[35]  B. Klinkenberg,et al.  Physiographically controlled allometry of specific sediment yield in the canadian cordillera: a lake sediment‐based approach , 2001 .

[36]  D. Montgomery Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography , 2001 .

[37]  W. J. Young,et al.  Large-scale patterns of erosion and sediment transport in river networks, with examples from Australia , 2001 .

[38]  J. Poesen,et al.  Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe , 2000 .

[39]  S. Trimble,et al.  U.S. Soil Erosion Rates--Myth and Reality , 2000, Science.

[40]  John Ewen,et al.  SHETRAN: Distributed River Basin Flow and Transport Modeling System , 2000 .

[41]  V. Chaplot,et al.  Field measurements of interrill erosion under ­different slopes and plot sizes , 2000 .

[42]  J. Poesen,et al.  Importance of slope gradient and contributing area for optimal prediction of the initiation and trajectory of ephemeral gullies , 1999 .

[43]  D. Walling Linking land use, erosion and sediment yields in river basins , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[44]  M. Church,et al.  Fluvial clastic sediment yield in Canada: scaled analysis , 1999 .

[45]  Trimble,et al.  Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the coon creek basin, wisconsin, 1975-93 , 1999, Science.

[46]  Ger Bergkamp A hierarchical view of the interactions of runoff and infiltration with vegetation and microtopography in semiarid shrublands , 1998 .

[47]  Y. Le Bissonnais,et al.  Crusting, runoff and sheet erosion on silty loamy soils at various scales and upscaling from m2 to small catchments , 1998 .

[48]  Matthias Hinderer,et al.  Terrestrial sediment yield and the lifetimes of reservoirs, lakes, and larger basins , 1997 .

[49]  J. Poesen,et al.  Erosion, flooding and channel management in Mediterranean environments of southern Europe , 1997 .

[50]  W. R. Osterkamp,et al.  Geomorphic considerations for erosion prediction , 1997 .

[51]  R. Evans,et al.  Some methods of directly assessing water erosion of cultivated land - a comparison of measurements made on plots and in fields , 1995 .

[52]  R. David,et al.  Landscape dissection and drainage area-slope thresholds , 1994 .

[53]  M. Summerfield,et al.  Natural controls of fluvial denudation rates in major world drainage basins , 1994 .

[54]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers , 1992, The Journal of Geology.

[55]  M. Inbar,et al.  Rates of fluvial erosion in basins with a Mediterranean type climate , 1992 .

[56]  M. Church,et al.  Disequilibrium of Holocene sediment yield in glaciated British Columbia , 1989, Nature.

[57]  D. Walling The sediment delivery problem , 1983 .

[58]  R. H. Meade,et al.  World-Wide Delivery of River Sediment to the Oceans , 1983, The Journal of Geology.

[59]  S. Schumm,et al.  Unsteady state denudation. , 1976, Science.

[60]  S. Trimble Denudation Studies: Can We Assume Stream Steady State? , 1975, Science.

[61]  Sam B. Maner Factors affecting sediment delivery rates in the red hills physiographic area , 1958 .

[62]  L. Gottschalk Problems of predicting sediment yields from watersheds , 1957 .

[63]  W. Renwick,et al.  Reservoir sedimentation trends in Ohio, USA: sediment delivery and response to land-use change. , 2006 .

[64]  W. H. Renwicka,et al.  The role of impoundments in the sediment budget of the conterminous United States , 2005 .

[65]  A. Dedkov 153. The Relationship between Sediment Yield and Drainage Basin Area , 2005 .

[66]  A. Dijk,et al.  Key controls and scale effects on sediment budgets : recent findings in agricultural upland Java, Indonesia , 2005 .

[67]  J. Poesen,et al.  Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs , 2003 .

[68]  J. B. Thornes,et al.  Mediterranean desertification: a mosaic of processes and responses , 2002 .

[69]  J. Albergel,et al.  Bilan de l'érosion sur les petits bassins versants des lacs collinaires de la dorsale tunisienne , 2001 .

[70]  Leonard J. Lane,et al.  Processes controlling sediment yield from watersheds as functions of spatial scale , 1997 .

[71]  H. M. Moore,et al.  Soil erosion and reservoir sedimentation in the High Atlas Mountains, southern Morocco , 1997 .

[72]  D. Walling,et al.  Erosion and sediment yield: a global overview , 1996 .

[73]  J. Poesen,et al.  Contribution of gully erosion to sediment production in cultivated lands and rangelands , 1996 .

[74]  P. Roggero,et al.  Effetto delle tecniche agronomiche di intensificazione foraggera sui fenomeni erosivi dei terreni in pendio in ambiente mediterraneo , 1994 .

[75]  P. Roggero,et al.  Influenza delle tecniche di miglioramento dei pascoli sui fenomeni erosivi dei terreni in pendio , 1989 .

[76]  D. L. Peck,et al.  Soil conservation and the reduction of erosion and sedimentation in the Coon Creek basin, Wisconsin , 1982 .

[77]  D. Walling,et al.  Sediment yields of rivers in areas of low precipitation: a global view , 1979 .

[78]  S. Schumm The Fluvial System , 1977 .

[79]  Ove Hoegh-Guldberg & Marine Freshwater Research , 2022 .