Fast pulmonary contour extraction in x-ray CT images: a methodology and quality assessment

Segmentation of thoracic X-Ray Computed Tomography images is a mandatory pre-processing step in many automated or semi- automated analysis tasks such us region identification, densitometric analysis, or even for 3D visualization purposes when a stack of slices has to be prepared for surface or volume rendering. In this work, we present a fully automated and fast method for pulmonary contour extraction and region identification. Our method combines adaptive intensity discrimination, geometrical feature estimation and morphological processing resulting into a fast and flexible algorithm. A complementary but not less important objective of this work consisted on a quality assessment study of the developed contour detection technique. The automatically extracted contours were statistically compared to manually drawn pulmonary outlines provided by two radiologists. Exploratory data analysis and non-parametric statistical tests were performed on the results obtained using several figures of merit. Results indicate that, besides a strong consistence among all the quality indexes, there is a wider inter-observer variability concerning both radiologists than the variability of our algorithm when compared to each one of the radiologists. As an overall conclusion we claim that the consistence and accuracy of our detection method is more than acceptable for most of the quantitative requirements mentioned by the radiologists.

[1]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Rule-based detection of intrathoracic airway trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Validation of Medical Image Analysis Techniques , 2000 .

[3]  K W McEnery,et al.  Helical CT: principles and technical considerations. , 1994, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Morphological methods in image and signal processing , 1988 .

[5]  Florent Aubry,et al.  The need to develop guidelines for the evaluation of medical image processing procedures , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[6]  G. W. Williams,et al.  Comparing the joint agreement of several raters with another rater. , 1976, Biometrics.

[7]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  CT image enhancement with wavelet analysis for the detection of small airways disease , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Michael F. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Method for segmenting chest CT image data using an anatomical model: preliminary results , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Computer recognition of regional lung disease patterns. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  S. R. Deans Random and Abel Transforms , 2000 .

[13]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Two methods for isolating the lung area of a CT scan for density information. , 1982, Radiology.

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography Images , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[15]  I.E. Abdou,et al.  Quantitative design and evaluation of enhancement/thresholding edge detectors , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  H Oeser,et al.  Measurement of Lung Density by Computed Tomography , 1978, Journal of computer assisted tomography.