Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. II. Zooplankton, primary producers and final conclusions.

Effects of chronic application of the fungicide Derosal(R) (active ingredient carbendazim) were studied in indoor macrophyte-dominated freshwater microcosms. The concentrations (0, 3.3, 33, 100, 330 and 1000 µg/l) were kept at a constant level for 4 weeks. This paper is the second of a series of two; it describes the effects on zooplankton and primary producers and presents an overall discussion. The zooplankton community was negatively affected by the three highest treatment levels (NOEC(community)=33 µg/l). At higher treatment levels Cladocera taxa were completely eliminated, while Copepod numbers were reduced. Rotatoria taxa decreased (Keratella quadrata and Lecane sp.) or increased in abundance (Testudinella parva) at the highest treatment level only. Due to the reduced grazing pressure, the abundance of some phytoplankton taxa and the chlorophyll-a content of the phytoplankton increased at the three highest treatment levels (NOEC(community)=33 µg/l). This effect was not observed for the periphyton, most probably because the reduced grazing pressure was compensated by the increased abundance of some snail species such as Lymnaea stagnalis and Physella acuta. At the end of the experimental period the biomass of the macrophyte Elodea nuttallii was significantly elevated at the two highest treatment levels. It is hypothesised that carbendazim might have caused, directly or indirectly, the removal of pathogene organisms from the macrophyte.

[1]  S. Crum,et al.  Toxicicity of derosal (active ingredient carbendazim) to aquatic invertebrates , 1998 .

[2]  N. Friberg,et al.  Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders , 1994 .

[3]  R. Roijackers,et al.  Effects of nutrient loading and insecticide application on the ecology of Elodea-dominated freshwater microcosms. II. Responses of macrophytes, periphyton and macroinvertebrate grazers. , 1995 .

[4]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Effects of the insecticide dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in outdoor experimental ditches: II. Invertebrate community responses and recovery , 1996 .

[5]  G. Hallegraeff,et al.  Some Problems in the Estimation of Chlorophyll-a and Phaeopigments from Pre- and Post-acidification Spectrophotometrie Measurements , 1978 .

[6]  T. Brock,et al.  Sensitivity of macrophyte-dominated freshwater microcosms to chronic levels of the herbicide linuron. II. Community metabolism and invertebrates. , 1997, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[7]  Gary M. Rand,et al.  Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology , 1985 .

[8]  E. Donk,et al.  Effects of Dursban® 4E and its carrier on three algal species during exponential and P-limited growth , 1992 .

[9]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Principal response curves: Analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress , 1999 .

[10]  I. R. Hill,et al.  Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals , 1994 .

[11]  T. Brock,et al.  On the choice of structural parameters and endpoints to indicate responses of freshwater ecosystems to perticide stress. , 1994 .

[12]  H. Voogd,et al.  Effects of nutrient loading and insecticide application on the ecology of Elodea-dominated freshwater microcosms. I. Water chemistry and responses of plankton. , 1995 .

[13]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. I. Water quality, breakdown of particulate organic matter and responses of macroinvertebrates. , 2000, Aquatic toxicology.

[14]  Williams Da,et al.  The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. , 1972 .