A safe and effective management strategy for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation and eliminating stroke

BACKGROUND Few injuries have produced as much debate with respect to management as have blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). Recent work (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 2013) from our institution suggested that 64-channel multidetector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) could be the primary screening tool for BCVI. Consequently, our screening algorithm changed from digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to CTA, with DSA reserved for definitive diagnosis of BCVI following CTA-positive study results or unexplained neurologic findings. The current study was performed to evaluate outcomes, including the potential for missed clinically significant BCVI, since this new management algorithm was adopted. METHODS Patients who underwent DSA (positive CTA finding or unexplained neurologic finding) over an 18-month period subsequent to the previous study were identified. Screening and confirmatory test results, complications, and BCVI-related strokes were reviewed and compared. RESULTS A total of 228 patients underwent DSA: 64% were male, with mean age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 43 years and 22, respectively. A total of 189 patients (83%) had a positive screening CTA result. Of these, DSA confirmed injury in 104 patients (55%); the remaining 85 patients (45%) (false-positive results) were found to have no injury on DSA. Five patients (4.8%) experienced BCVI-related strokes, unchanged from the previous study (3.9%, p = 0.756); two were symptomatic at trauma center presentation, and three occurred while receiving appropriate therapy. No patient with a negative screening CTA result experienced a stroke. CONCLUSION This management scheme using 64-channel CTA for screening coupled with DSA for definitive diagnosis was proven to be safe and effective in identifying clinically significant BCVIs and maintaining a low stroke rate. Definitive diagnosis by DSA led to avoidance of potentially harmful anticoagulation in 45% of CTA-positive patients (false-positive results). No strokes resulted from injuries missed by CTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic study, level III.

[1]  Ben L Zarzaur,et al.  Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  C. Bloomer,et al.  Screening multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation on blunt neck injuries: an evidence-based approach. , 2009, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[3]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Importance of Routine Follow-Up Arteriography , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[4]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. , 1996 .

[5]  D. Magee,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  T. Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[9]  C. Sliker,et al.  Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  B. Walters,et al.  Management of blunt extracranial traumatic cerebrovascular injury: a multidisciplinary survey of current practice , 2011, World journal of emergency surgery : WJES.

[12]  E. Moore,et al.  Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[13]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injury: is it ready for primetime? , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Blunt carotid artery injury: the futility of aggressive screening and diagnosis. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[17]  Ben L Zarzaur,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: More slices finally cut it , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[18]  T. Fabian,et al.  Optimal outcomes for patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI): tailoring treatment to the lesion. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.