Online and face-to-face discussions in the classroom: a study on the experiences of 'active' and 'silent' students

Even though the advantages of online discussions over face-to-face discussion formats has been extensively reported and investigated, the blending of online discussion tools in co-located classroom settings has been considered with far less intensity. In this paper, we report on secondary school students' experiences and preferences concerning two different discussion formats in co-located classroom settings, namely face-to-face (F2F) and synchronous, computer-mediated communication (CMC). In addition, we also differentiate between students that are known to be active participants in F2F classroom discussions and those who usually remain silent. The findings highlight several advantages of CMC over F2F discussions in co-located settings and show that different students ('active' and 'silent') experience F2F and computer-mediated communication differently.

[1]  B. Rogoff.  Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[2]  S. Herring.  Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis : An Approach to Researching Online Behavior , 2004 .

[3]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[4]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Observing Tutorial Dialogues Collaboratively: Insights About Human Tutoring Effectiveness From Vicarious Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[6]  James H. Gray,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: COMING TO TERMS WITH COMMUNITY , 2004 .

[7]  N. Webb,et al.  Constructive Activity and Learning in Collaborative Small Groups. , 1995 .

[8]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation in a changing world , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[9]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning , 2007 .

[10]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[11]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? , 2008 .

[12]  J. Suler.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.

[13]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[14]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The role of argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue , 2009 .

[15]  Avner Caspi,et al.  The Influence of Personality on Social Participation in Learning Environments , 2006 .