Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares Analysis: Methodology and Numerical Examples

In wide range of applications for empirical data analysis, the assumption that data is collected from a single homogeneous population is often unrealistic. In particular, the identification of different groups of consumers and their appropriate consideration in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling constitutes a critical issue in marketing. In this work, we introduce a finite mixture PLS software implementation which separates data on the basis of the estimates’ heterogeneity in the inner path model. Numerical examples using experimental as well as empirical data allow the verification of the methodology’s effectiveness and usefulness. The approach permits a reliable identification of distinctive customer segments along with characteristic estimates for relationships between latent variables. Researchers and practitioners can employ this method as a model evaluation technique and thereby assure that results on the aggregate data level are not affected by unobserved heterogeneity in the inner path model estimates. Otherwise, the analysis provides further indications on how to treat that problem by forming groups of data in order to perform a multi-group path analysis.

[1]  H. Schneeweiß Models with latent variables: LISREL versus PLS , 1991 .

[2]  Ronald T. Wilcox,et al.  Identifying Price Sensitive Consumers: The Relative Merits of Demographic vs , 1999 .

[3]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Do We Fully Understand the Critical Success Factors of Customer Satisfaction with Industrial Goods? - Extending Festge and Schwaiger’s Model to Account for Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2009 .

[4]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[5]  Frank Huber,et al.  Capturing Customer Heterogeneity using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach , 2002 .

[6]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling , 2000 .

[7]  Peter Hackl,et al.  On structural equation modelling for customer satisfaction measurement , 2000 .

[8]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  On the Heterogeneity of Demand , 1998 .

[9]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[10]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data , 1993 .

[11]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[12]  M. Sarstedt A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modelling , 2008 .

[13]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Customer Value Analysis in a Heterogeneous Market , 2001 .

[15]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares , 2010 .

[16]  鄭宇庭 行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[17]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Market Segmentation for Customer Satisfaction Studies via a New Latent Structure Multidimensional Scaling Model , 2005 .

[18]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[19]  L. Hildebrandt,et al.  Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung — Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs-Modells , 2006 .

[20]  K. Jöreskog Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices , 1978 .

[21]  Michel Wedel,et al.  International Market Segmentation Based on Consumer–Product Relations , 1999 .

[22]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[23]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies , 2010 .

[24]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[25]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[26]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[27]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[28]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[29]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling , 2008 .

[30]  Silvia Squillacciotti,et al.  Prediction Oriented Classification in PLS Path Modeling , 2010 .

[31]  Christian M. Ringle,et al.  Capturing and Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity by Response Based Segmentation in PLS Path Modeling. A Comparison of Alternative Methods by Computational Experiments , 2007 .

[32]  R. Meyers,et al.  The “Ball of Confusion” in Federal Budgeting: A Shadow Agenda for Deliberative Reform of the Budget Process , 2009 .

[33]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[34]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[35]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[36]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity , 2000 .

[37]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Identifying Sources of Heterogeneity for Empirically Deriving Strategic Types: A Constrained Finite-Mixture Structural-Equation Methodology , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[38]  R. Bagozzi Principles of marketing research , 1994 .