Introduction to the AMPERE model intercomparison studies on the economics of climate stabilization

[1]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or breaking climate targets - The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy" , 2015 .

[2]  K. Calvin,et al.  Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways , 2015, Climatic Change.

[3]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios , 2014, Climatic Change.

[4]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: A multi-model analysis☆ , 2014 .

[5]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[6]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Harmonization vs. fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27 , 2014, Climatic Change.

[7]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets , 2013 .

[8]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C , 2013 .

[9]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[10]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action , 2012, Climatic Change.

[11]  Malte Meinshausen,et al.  Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming , 2012, Climatic Change.

[12]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[13]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[14]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation , 2009 .

[15]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Implications of delayed participation and technology failure for the feasibility, costs, and likelihood of staying below temperature targets—Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for the 21st century , 2009 .

[16]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  The distribution and magnitude of emissions mitigation costs in climate stabilization under less than perfect international cooperation: SGM results☆ , 2009 .

[17]  T. Rutherford,et al.  International climate policy: a “second best” solution for a “second best” world? , 2009 .

[18]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Fast-Growing Countries: The Benefits of Early Action , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  M. Tavoni,et al.  Delayed action and uncertain stabilisation targets. How much will the delay cost? , 2009 .

[20]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Stabilizing CO2 concentrations with incomplete international cooperation , 2008 .

[21]  Shilpa Rao,et al.  International climate regimes: effects of delayed participation , 2007 .

[22]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy , 2015 .

[23]  Johannes Bollen,et al.  The value of air pollution co-benefits of climate policies: : Analysis with a global sector-trade CGE model called WorldScan , 2015 .

[24]  J. Eom,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies , 2014 .

[25]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals , 2014 .

[26]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Assessment of carbon leakage through the industry channel: The EU perspective , 2015 .

[27]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies , 2015 .

[28]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways , 2015 .

[29]  P. Lucas,et al.  Impact of fragmented emission reduction regimes on the energy market and on CO2 emissions related to land use: A case study with China and the European Union as first movers , 2015 .

[30]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios , 2015 .

[31]  Jérôme Hilaire,et al.  Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets , 2015 .

[32]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Assessments of GHG emission reduction scenarios of different levels and different short-term pledges through macro- and sectoral decomposition analyses , 2015 .

[33]  Jiyong Eom,et al.  Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets , 2015 .

[34]  H. Turton,et al.  Induced technological change in moderate and fragmented climate change mitigation regimes , 2015 .

[35]  Alban Kitous,et al.  Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: an assessment with the POLES model , 2015 .

[36]  D. McCollum,et al.  Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants , 2015 .

[37]  M. Hamdi-Chérif,et al.  Energy efficiency policies and the timing of action: An assessment of climate mitigation costs , 2015 .

[38]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[39]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Assessing Pathways toward Ambitious Climate Targets at the Global and European levels: A Synthesis of Results from the AMPERE Project , 2014 .

[40]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[41]  Joseph J. Lagowski,et al.  The Implications of , 1989 .