Behaviors of networks with antagonistic interactions and switching topologies

In this paper, we study the discrete-time consensus problem over networks with antagonistic and cooperative interactions. A cooperative interaction between two nodes takes place when one node receives the true state of the other while an antagonistic interaction happens when the former receives the opposite of the true state of the latter. We adopt a quite general model where the node communications can be either unidirectional or bidirectional, the network topology graph may vary over time, and the cooperative or antagonistic relations can be time-varying. It is proven that, the limits of all the node states exist, and the absolute values of the node states reach consensus if the switching interaction graph is uniformly jointly strongly connected for unidirectional topologies, or infinitely jointly connected for bidirectional topologies. These results are independent of the switching of the interaction relations. We construct a counterexample to indicate a rather surprising fact that quasi-strong connectivity of the interaction graph, i.e., the graph contains a directed spanning tree, is not sufficient to guarantee the consensus in absolute values even under fixed topologies. Based on these results, we also propose sufficient conditions for bipartite consensus to be achieved over the network with joint connectivity. Finally, simulation results using a discrete-time Kuramoto model are given to illustrate the convergence results showing that the proposed framework is applicable to a class of networks with general nonlinear dynamics.

[1]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Dynamics of Opinion Forming in Structurally Balanced Social Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  Julien M. Hendrickx,et al.  A lifting approach to models of opinion dynamics with antagonisms , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: Convergence Rates, Measurement Delays, and Asynchronous Events , 2008, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[5]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Distributed Asynchronous Deterministic and Stochastic Gradient Optimization Algorithms , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[6]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  D. Bauso,et al.  Quantized Dissensus in Networks of Agents Subject to Death and Duplication , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[9]  J.N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence in Multiagent Coordination, Consensus, and Flocking , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: Convergence Rates, Measurement Delays, and Asynchronous Events , 2008, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[13]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[14]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[15]  S. Strogatz From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators , 2000 .

[16]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Maria Elena Valcher,et al.  On the consensus and bipartite consensus in high-order multi-agent dynamical systems with antagonistic interactions , 2014, Syst. Control. Lett..

[18]  Luc Moreau,et al.  Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Ziyang Meng,et al.  Robust cooperative tracking for multiple non-identical second-order nonlinear systems , 2013, Autom..

[20]  Guodong Shi,et al.  Global target aggregation and state agreement of nonlinear multi-agent systems with switching topologies , 2009, Autom..

[21]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  How Agreement and Disagreement Evolve over Random Dynamic Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence of Type-Symmetric and Cut-Balanced Consensus Seeking Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[23]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms , 1986 .