Intercomparison of bias‐correction methods for monthly temperature and precipitation simulated by multiple climate models

[1] Bias-correction methods applied to monthly temperature and precipitation data simulated by multiple General Circulation Models (GCMs) are evaluated in this study. Although various methods have been proposed recently, an intercomparison among them using multiple GCM simulations has seldom been reported. Moreover, no previous methods have addressed the issue how to adequately deal with the changes of the statistics of bias-corrected variables from the historical to future simulations. In this study, a new method which conserves the changes of mean and standard deviation of the uncorrected model simulation data is proposed, and then five previous bias-correction methods as well as the proposed new method are intercompared by applying them to monthly temperature and precipitation data simulated from 12 GCMs in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3) archives. Parameters of each method are calibrated by using 1948–1972 observed data and validated in the 1974–1998 period. These methods are then applied to the GCM future simulations (2073–2097) and the bias-corrected data are intercompared. For the historical simulations, negligible difference can be found between observed and bias-corrected data. However, the differences in future simulations are large dependent on the characteristics of each method. The new method successfully conserves the changes in the mean, standard deviation and the coefficient of variation before and after bias-correction. The differences of bias-corrected data among methods are discussed according to their respective characteristics. Importantly, this study classifies available correction methods into two distinct categories, and articulates important features for each of them.

[1]  N. Arnell.  Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios , 2004 .

[2]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Simulated Hydrologic Responses to Climate Variations and Change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099 , 2001 .

[3]  A. Weerts,et al.  Discharge simulations performed with a hydrological model using bias corrected regional climate model input , 2009 .

[4]  E. Wood,et al.  Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching , 2010 .

[5]  Christopher Moseley,et al.  Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales , 2010 .

[6]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models , 2010 .

[7]  E. Maurer.  Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios , 2007 .

[8]  L. V. Beek,et al.  The ability of a GCM-forced hydrological model to reproduce global discharge variability , 2010 .

[9]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids , 2005 .

[10]  D. Easterling,et al.  Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment , 2012 .

[11]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability : Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[12]  A. Wood,et al.  Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America , 2008 .

[13]  J. Christensen,et al.  On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[14]  K. Takara,et al.  Assessing climate change impact on water resources in the Tone River basin, Japan, using super-high-resolution atmospheric model output. , 2009 .

[15]  Remko Uijlenhoet,et al.  Changes in Streamflow Dynamics in the Rhine Basin under Three High-Resolution Regional Climate Scenarios , 2010 .

[16]  H. V. D. Dool,et al.  A global monthly land surface air temperature analysis for 1948-present , 2008 .

[17]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .

[18]  Petra Döll,et al.  Global-scale modeling of glacier mass balances for water resources assessments: Glacier mass changes between 1948 and 2006 , 2010 .

[19]  R. Leander,et al.  Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows , 2007 .

[20]  Remko Uijlenhoet,et al.  Evaluation of a bias correction method applied to downscaled precipitation and temperature reanalysis data for the Rhine basin , 2010 .

[21]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[22]  J. Hansen,et al.  Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies , 2006 .

[23]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods – a case study on the Lule River basin , 2007 .

[24]  J. Janowiak,et al.  Global Land Precipitation: A 50-yr Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations , 2002 .

[25]  E. Martin,et al.  Comparison of three downscaling methods in simulating the impact of climate change on the hydrology of Mediterranean basins , 2010 .

[26]  Koji Dairaku,et al.  Evaluation and intercomparison of downscaled daily precipitation indices over Japan in present-day climate: Strengths and weaknesses of dynamical and bias correction-type statistical downscaling methods , 2011 .

[27]  M. Clark,et al.  Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations , 2001 .

[28]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs , 2004 .

[29]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  From climate model ensembles to climate change impacts and adaptation: A case study of water resource management in the southwest of England , 2009 .

[30]  S. Kanae,et al.  A 59-year (1948-2006) global near-surface meteorological data set for land surface models. Part I: Development of daily forcing and assessment of precipitation intensity , 2008 .

[31]  Petra Döll,et al.  Estimating the Impact of Global Change on Flood and Drought Risks in Europe: A Continental, Integrated Analysis , 2006 .

[32]  G. H. Leavesley.  Impacts of Climate Change and Climate Variability on Hydrological Regimes: Overview of models for use in the evaluation of the impacts of climate change on hydrology , 1999 .

[33]  S. Steele‐Dunne,et al.  The impacts of climate change on hydrology in Ireland , 2008 .

[34]  Bart van den Hurk,et al.  Estimated changes in flood quantiles of the river Meuse from resampling of regional climate model output , 2008 .

[35]  R. Wilby,et al.  A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom , 2005 .

[36]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[37]  Kuniyoshi Takeuchi,et al.  Future hydroclimatology of the Mekong River basin simulated using the high‐resolution Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) AGCM , 2008 .