Determinants of territory size in the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae

SummaryFactors governing the size of territories defended by the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae, were investigated, prompted by contradictory predictions in the literature concerning the effects of food supply and competitors. Observations were carried out over the non-breeding period (March–October) on a medium density population in which territories were partially contiguous. The territory size of adult fish varied between 3 and 26 m2, and was inversely correlated with local densities of conspecifics. The same range in territory size was found for both males and females, which did not differ in the time they spent on territory defence and foraging activities. No correlation existed between territory size and the abundance of algal food, body size, age or time spent on territory defence. Also, there was little variation in territory size over time, despite seasonal changes in the abundance of food algae.Experimental reduction of food supplies on isolated territories of males and females had no effect on territory size. In a higher density habitat an experiment was carried out in which population density and food abundance were simultaneously manipulated. This showed that territory size was primarily determined by intraspecific interactions, as territories exhibited considerable increases in size upon removal of neighbours. No changes in the size of defended areas resulted from either artificial increases or decreases of food levels. There were also no changes in the time spent on defence of territories, foraging time or feeding rates associated with food manipulations or territory expansion, which suggested that food was not a limited resource. This conflicted with current theories proposed to explain territory defence and expansion. It is hypothesized that intraspecific interactions constrain territory size well below the optimum in terms of the abundance of preferred food algal species.

[1]  J. Krebs.  Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit , 1971 .

[2]  R. Harris.  Aggression, superterritories, and reproductive success in tree swallows , 1979 .

[3]  J. Krebs.  Song and territory in the Great tit Parus major , 1977 .

[4]  M. J. Herz,et al.  Changes in Aggressive Interaction in Adjacently Territorial Convict Cichlids (Cichlasoma Nigrofasciatum): a Study of Habituation , 1971 .

[5]  M. Hixon.  An Experimental Analysis of Territoriality in the California Reef Fish Embiotoca jacksoni (Embiotocidae) , 1981 .

[6]  P. Ewald,et al.  Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird , 2004, Oecologia.

[7]  C. Krebs,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EXTRA FOOD ON SMALL RODENT POPULATIONS: II. VOLES (MICROTUS TOWNSENDII) , 1981 .

[8]  T. Northcote,et al.  Effects of Prey Abundance on Density and Territorial Behavior of Young Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) in Laboratory Stream Channels , 1974 .

[9]  C. Simon.  The Influence of Food Abundance on Territory Size in the Iguanid Lizard Sceloporus jarrovi , 1975 .

[10]  K. Dixon.  Territoriality and Survival in the Plain Titmouse , 1956 .

[11]  B. Skinner,et al.  The evolution of behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  J. Burger.  Super Territories: A Comment , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[13]  M. Willig,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Social Spacing in Tamias Striatus , 1982 .

[14]  J. Pleasants,et al.  The Super-Territory Hypothesis: A Critique, or Why There Are So Few Bullies , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[15]  M. Hixon.  Energy Maximizers and Time Minimizers: Theory and Reality , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[16]  James F. Wittenberger.  Animal Social Behavior , 1981 .

[17]  D. Welsh.  Savannah Sparrow Breeding and Territoriality on a Nova Scotia Dune Beach , 1975 .

[18]  J. Myers,et al.  Territory size in wintering Sanderlings: the effects of prey abundance and intruder density , 1979 .

[19]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .

[20]  L. Dill,et al.  An energy-based model of optimal feeding-territory size. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  R. Larson.  Territorial behavior of the black and yellow rockfish and gopher rockfish (Scorpaenidae, Sebastes) , 1980 .

[22]  T. Schoener,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN HOME-RANGE SIZE IN SOME ANOLIS LIZARDS' , 1982 .

[23]  J. Verner.  On the Adaptive Significance of Territoriality , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Stimson.  The Role of the Territory in the Ecology of the Intertidal Limpet Lottia Gigantea (Gray) , 1973 .

[25]  T. Schoener.  Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[26]  T. Schoener,et al.  Densities, Sex Ratios, and Population Structure in Four Species of Bahamian Anolis Lizards , 1980 .

[27]  R. B. Root.  The Behavior and Reproductive Success of the Blue-Gray Gnatcatcher , 1969 .

[28]  James H. Brown,et al.  Influence of Economics, Interspecific Competition, and Sexual Dimorphism on Territoriality of Migrant Rufous Hummingbirds , 1978 .

[29]  L. Dill,et al.  Food abundance and territory size in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 1981 .

[30]  T. Schoener.  Simple Models of Optimal Feeding-Territory Size: A Reconciliation , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[31]  G. Tullock.  On the Adaptive Significance of Territoriality: Comment , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[32]  G. Hunt,et al.  TERRITORY SIZE IN WESTERN GULLS: IMPORTANCE OF INTRUSION PRESSURE, DEFENSE INVESTMENTS, AND VEGETATION STRUCTURE' , 1980 .

[33]  P. Sale.  Patterns of use of space in a guild of territorial reef fishes , 1974 .

[34]  M. Hixon.  Food Production and Competitor Density as the Determinants of Feeding Territory Size , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[35]  J. T. Armstrong.  Breeding Home Range in the Nighthawk and Other Birds: Its Evolutionary and Ecological Significance , 1965 .

[36]  M. J. Taitt.  The Effect of Extra Food on Small Rodent Populations: I. Deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus) , 1981 .

[37]  Geoff Jones.  The influence of habitat and behavioural interactions on the local distribution of the wrasse, Pseudolabrus celidotus , 1984, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[38]  Adam Watson,et al.  Territory Size and Aggression in a Fluctuating Red Grouse Population , 1971 .

[39]  P. Colgan.  Is a Super-Territory Strategy Stable? , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Choat,et al.  Density and distribution patterns of the temperate marine fish Cheilodactylus spectabilis (Cheilodactylidae) in a reef environment , 1980 .

[41]  J. Collins,et al.  Test of a hypothesis of territory regulation in an insectivorous bird by experimentally increasing prey abundance , 2004, Oecologia.

[42]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Avian Territoriality: Sufficient Resources or Interference Competition , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Geoff Jones.  Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  J. Ebersole.  Food Density and Territory Size: An Alternative Model and a Test on the Reef Fish Eupomacentrus leucostictus , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[45]  R. Ross.  Territorial Behavior and Ecology of the Anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam1) , 1978 .

[46]  T. Getty.  On the Benefits of Aggression: The Adaptiveness of Inhibition and Super Territories , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[47]  C. Ralph,et al.  Correlation of Age, Size of Territory, Plumage, and Breeding Success in White-Crowned Sparrows , 1971 .

[48]  M. C. Baker,et al.  The use of space by white-crowned sparrows: Juvenile and adult ranging patterns and home range versus body size comparisons in an avian granivore community , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.