Accurate prediction of quality of transmission based on a dynamically configurable optical impairment model

We have proposed a dynamically configurable and fast optical impairment model for the abstraction of the optical physical layer, enabling new capabilities such as indirect estimation of physical operating parameters in multivendor networks based on pre-FEC BER information and machine learning. BER is commonly reported by deployed coherent transponders; therefore, this scheme does not increase hardware cost. The estimated parameters can subsequently be used to predict optical signal quality at the receiver of not-already-established optical connections more accurately than possible based on the limited amount of information available at the time of offline system design. The higher accuracy and certainty reduce the required amount of required system margin that must be allocated to guarantee reliable optical connectivity. The remaining margin can then be applied toward increased transmission capacity, or a reduced number of regenerators in the network. We demonstrate the quality of transmission prediction experimentally in an optical mesh network with 0.6 dB Q-factor accuracy, and quantify the benefit in terms of network capacity gain in metro networks by impairment-aware network simulation.

[1]  I. Tomkos,et al.  Cognitive dynamic optical networks , 2013, 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC).

[2]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  Cognitive dynamic optical networks [invited] , 2013, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[3]  P. Poggiolini The GN Model of Non-Linear Propagation in Uncompensated Coherent Optical Systems , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Michael Rabbat,et al.  Cross-Layer Monitoring in Transparent Optical Networks , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[5]  Subrat Kar,et al.  Network equipment and their procurement strategy for high capacity elastic optical networks , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[6]  John F. Sowa,et al.  The cognitive cycle , 2015, 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[7]  Takeshi Hoshida,et al.  A Learning Living Network With Open ROADMs , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[8]  Joseph M. Kahn,et al.  Convex Channel Power Optimization in Nonlinear WDM Systems Using Gaussian Noise Model , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Robust cognitive-GN BER estimator for dynamic WDM networks , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[10]  Takeshi Hoshida,et al.  Accurate prediction of quality of transmission with dynamically configurable optical impairment model , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[11]  C. R. Giles,et al.  Modeling erbium-doped fiber amplifiers , 1991 .

[12]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Moving Horizon Estimation , 2018, Encyclopedia of Systems and Control.

[13]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[14]  K. Christodoulopoulos,et al.  Estimating QoT of unestablished lightpaths , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[15]  David J. Ives,et al.  Adapting Transmitter Power and Modulation Format to Improve Optical Network Performance Utilizing the Gaussian Noise Model of Nonlinear Impairments , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.