Disciplinary reach: Investigating the impact of dataset reuse in the earth sciences

In the realm of scholarly communication, scientific datasets are becoming more widely recognized for their scholarly and reuse value. However, given the investment toward maintaining and storing research data for long-term access, there is no clear strategy or metric for determining the reuse of research datasets. This study proposes a novel approach to track use and measure the impact of publically accessible datasets in scholarly publications through disciplinary reach- the number of unique journals and related subject categorizations in which articles are published. Using affiliated publication(s), described by the author as the works identified by the dataset creator or curator related to a dataset, the principles underlying the bibliometric technique of citation analysis are leveraged and applied. Preliminary results show that for earth science datasets, affiliated publications were primarily cited in physical science and multidisciplinary journals, indicating these datasets may have an impact on a number of different research areas. Continued refinement of these approaches, measures, and the design will serve to broaden our understanding of the reuse potential of scientific data and their influence on advancing scholarship.

[1]  Toby Green,et al.  We need publishing standards for datasets and data tables , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[2]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[4]  N. D. Bellis Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics , 2009 .

[5]  Jared Lyle,et al.  The Enduring Value of Social Science Research: The Use and Reuse of Primary Research Data , 2010, iPRES.

[6]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[7]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[8]  Hilary Davis,et al.  Datasets, a Shift in the Currency of Scholarly Communication: Implications for Library Collections and Acquisitions , 2007 .

[9]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The need for archiving data in evolutionary biology , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[11]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Data citation in the wild , 2010 .

[12]  M. H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences , 2010 .

[13]  Micah Altman,et al.  A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data , 2008 .

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.

[15]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[16]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[17]  Ruth E. Duerr,et al.  Data Citation and Peer Review , 2010 .

[18]  Loet Leydesdorff How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? , 2009 .

[19]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Scientific data repositories on the Web: An initial survey , 2010 .

[21]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[22]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[23]  S. Fienberg,et al.  Sharing research data , 1985 .

[24]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[25]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[26]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.