Analysis of parenchymal patterns using conspicuous spatial frequency features in mammograms applied to the BI-RADS density rating scheme

Automatic classification of the density of breast parenchyma is shown using a measure that is correlated to the human observer performance, and compared against the BI-RADS density rating. Increasingly popular in the United States, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is used to draw attention to the increased screening difficulty associated with greater breast density; however, the BI-RADS rating scheme is subjective and is not intended as an objective measure of breast density. So, while popular, BI-RADS does not define density classes using a standardized measure, which leads to increased variability among observers. The adaptive thresholding technique is a more quantitative approach for assessing the percentage breast density, but considerable reader interaction is required. We calculate an objective density rating that is derived using a measure of local feature salience. Previously, this measure was shown to correlate well with radiologists' localization and discrimination of true positive and true negative regions-of-interest. Using conspicuous spatial frequency features, an objective density rating is obtained and correlated with adaptive thresholding, and the subjectively ascertained BI-RADS density ratings. Using 100 cases, obtained from the University of South Florida's DDSM database, we show that an automated breast density measure can be derived that is correlated with the interactive thresholding method for continuous percentage breast density, but not with the BI-RADS density rating categories for the selected cases. Comparison between interactive thresholding and the new salience percentage density resulted in a Pearson correlation of 76.7%. Using a four-category scale equivalent to the BI-RADS density categories, a Spearman correlation coefficient of 79.8% was found.

[1]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  I. T. Young Further Consideration of Sample and Feature Size. , 1978 .

[4]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[6]  J J Heine,et al.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[7]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  Murray H. Loew,et al.  Conspicuous spatial frequency features in mammograms using a mixed-effects model , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  M Souto,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  John Collomosse,et al.  Painterly rendering using image salience , 2002, Proceedings 20th Eurographics UK Conference.

[13]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  R. Rosenholtz A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  Murray H. Loew,et al.  Salient features in mammograms using Gabor filters and clustering , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: results of formal operator training. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[20]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.