Ultrafiltration versus sedimentation-based pretreatment in Fujairah-1 RO plant: Environmental impact study

Abstract Commonly, the main contributors to the environmental impacts of desalination are energy consumptions and chemical usage. In this work, two alternatives for pretreatment of seawater feed to Fujairah-1 seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant, in United Arab Emirates, were compared: sedimentation-based and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane-based pretreatment. Life cycle analysis (LCA) methodology was applied in this case study research, based on real data from the Fujairah-1 plant for the sedimentation-based system and full design data for the alternative UF system, provided by X-Flow®. By use of the LCA, a comprehensive environmental modeling of the considered options was conducted. The pretreatment systems, including their components (e.g., equipment) and material and energy flows throughout their lifetime, were modeled. Environmental impacts of these systems, using alternative energy mixes, were also modeled. Our findings indicate that a membrane-based pretreatment has a lower environmental impact, throughout the system's life cycle, than the existing sedimentation-based pretreatment in the Fujairah-1 desalination plant. This result holds under all alternative energy mix assumptions; including renewable, natural gas, oil, and nuclear energy. Our findings also show that the most significant contributor to the overall environmental impacts of both pretreatment systems is energy consumption.

[1]  G. K. Pearce,et al.  UF/MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: a comparison of energy costs , 2008 .

[2]  Hassan Radhi,et al.  Evaluating the potential impact of global warming on the UAE residential buildings – A contribution to reduce the CO2 emissions , 2009 .

[3]  Shiv Kumar,et al.  Life cycle cost analysis of single slope hybrid (PV/T) active solar still , 2009 .

[4]  I. Wenten.  ULTRAFILTRATION IN WATER TREATMENT AND ITS EVALUATION AS PRE-TREATMENT FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEM , 2008 .

[5]  T. Höpner,et al.  Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination , 2008 .

[6]  E. G. Darton,et al.  Pretreatment procedures to control biogrowth and scale formation in membrane systems , 1997 .

[7]  J. J. Sadhwani,et al.  Case studies on environmental impact of seawater desalination , 2005 .

[8]  Bo Nordell,et al.  Thermal pollution causes global warming , 2003 .

[9]  Scott Kennedy,et al.  How green solar desalination really is? Environmental assessment using life-cycle analysis (LCA) approach , 2012 .

[10]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Life cycle assessment of MSF, MED and RO desalination technologies , 2006 .

[11]  M. Thompson.  Cultural Theory and integrated assessment , 1997 .

[12]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Global water outlook to 2025 , 2002 .

[13]  H. Ettouney,et al.  Fundamentals of Salt Water Desalination , 2002 .

[14]  K. Glucina,et al.  Assessment of UF pretreatment prior RO membranes for seawater desalination , 1999 .

[15]  Hassan E.S. Fath,et al.  Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies , 2011 .

[16]  Kenneth M Persson,et al.  Worldwide Oil Prize, Desalination and Population Growth Correlation Study , 2009 .

[17]  R. Field.  Fundamentals of Fouling , 2010 .

[18]  Miguel Angel Sanza,et al.  Fujairah reverse osmosis plant: 2 years of operation , 2007 .

[19]  M. Abdel-Jawad,et al.  Conventional pretreatment system for the Doha Reverse Osmosis Plant: Technical and economic assessment , 1995 .

[20]  S. Farhat,et al.  The relation between the RO fouling membrane and the feed water quality and the pretreatment in Djerba Island plant , 2012 .