Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.

Recently the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) updated its methods guidance for technology assessment. One aspect of the new guidance is to require the use of probabilistic sensitivity analysis with all cost-effectiveness models submitted to the Institute. The purpose of this paper is to place the NICE guidance on dealing with uncertainty into a broader context of the requirements for decision making; to explain the general approach that was taken in its development; and to address each of the issues which have been raised in the debate about the role of probabilistic sensitivity analysis in general. The most appropriate starting point for developing guidance is to establish what is required for decision making. On the basis of these requirements, the methods and framework of analysis which can best meet these needs can then be identified. It will be argued that the guidance on dealing with uncertainty and, in particular, the requirement for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, is justified by the requirements of the type of decisions that NICE is asked to make. Given this foundation, the main issues and criticisms raised during and after the consultation process are reviewed. Finally, some of the methodological challenges posed by the need fully to characterise decision uncertainty and to inform the research agenda will be identified and discussed.

[1]  A E Ades,et al.  Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  M D Stevenson,et al.  Gaussian Process Modeling in Conjunction with Individual Patient Simulation Modeling: A Case Study Describing the Calculation of Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for the Treatment of Established Osteoporosis , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  A. Gafni,et al.  The NICE reference case requirement: more pain for what, if any, gain? , 2004, PharmacoEconomics.

[4]  P. Langley The NICE reference case requirement: implications for drug manufacturers and health systems. , 2004, PharmacoEconomics.

[5]  Andrew Briggs,et al.  The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment , 2004, Applied health economics and health policy.

[6]  Jonathan Karnon,et al.  Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation. , 2003, Health economics.

[7]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M. Drummond,et al.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  A E Ades,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of a Multiparameter Decision Model: Consistency of Evidence and the Accurate Assessment of Uncertainty , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  R. Taylor,et al.  NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Andrew H Briggs,et al.  Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. , 2002, Annual review of public health.

[13]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2001, Health economics.

[14]  J Hjelmgren,et al.  Health economic guidelines--similarities, differences and some implications. , 2001, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  R. J. Harman,et al.  National Institute for clinical excellence preoperative tests: Is the consensus hard to get?: 1AP3-9 , 2007 .

[16]  D Meltzer,et al.  Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[17]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Bayesian value-of-information analysis. An application to a policy model of Alzheimer's disease. , 2001, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[18]  S. Palmer,et al.  Incorporating option values into the economic evaluation of health care technologies. , 2000, Journal of health economics.

[19]  K Claxton,et al.  The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[20]  A H Briggs,et al.  A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1999, Health economics.

[21]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[22]  K Claxton,et al.  An economic approach to clinical trial design and research priority-setting. , 1996, Health economics.

[23]  M J Al,et al.  Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. , 1994, Health economics.

[24]  Bernie J. O'Brien,et al.  In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health Care , 1994, Medical care.

[25]  W C Black,et al.  The CE Plane , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  K E Willard,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Decision Trees Using Monte Carlo Simulation , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  B. McNeil,et al.  Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation , 1985, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.