The impacts of personal characteristic on educational effectiveness in controlled-project based learning on software intensive systems development

In practical courses on software-intensive business systems, students work in teams to acquire practical skills in systems acquisition and provisioning. However, we do not yet have an established method to determine the optimal team composition to achieve maximum educational effectiveness. In this study, we quantitatively and qualitatively investigate how personal characteristics and the learning process of team members affect educational effectiveness by examining a university course in which students work in teams on a realistic project in a classroom setting. We use the Five Factors and Stress (FFS) theory and the modified grounded theory approach (M-GTA) to measure the personal characteristics and to identify the learning process of each team member. Additionally, we compare the learning process of a team with a high educational effectiveness to one with a low educational effectiveness based on number of topics about the learning process and the kind of topics. As a result, we find that it is better for a team to have members with different personal characteristic as defined by FFS theory in order for the students to acquire more knowledge and skills through the course. Additionally, teams that focus on fewer learning process topics acquire more knowledge and skills. We expect that our findings will help increase the educational effectiveness in similar practical courses.

[1]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[2]  Stanley E. Long,et al.  The Whole Brain Business Book , 1998 .

[3]  Komiya Seiichi,et al.  Optimal Team Formation for Software Development Exercise -- Evaluating a Method for Team Formation Based on the Type of Project Manager , 2009 .

[4]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model , 2009, 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[5]  Kenichi Shimura,et al.  Compare and Contrast of Grounded Theory and KJ Method , 2010 .

[6]  Tore Dybå,et al.  A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[7]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  Understanding individual contribution and collaboration in student software teams , 2013, 2013 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).

[8]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  Nursing care process for releasing psychiatric inpatients from long-term seclusion in Japan: modified grounded theory approach. , 2014, Nursing & health sciences.

[9]  Chris Beaumont,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of ICT to support globally distributed PBL teams , 2004, ITiCSE '04.

[10]  Yoshiaki Matsuzawa,et al.  Learners’ use of SNA-based discourse analysis as a self-assessment tool for collaboration , 2012 .

[11]  志村 健一,et al.  Compare and Contrast of Grounded Theory and KJ Method , 2005 .

[12]  Katsuhiko Kakehi,et al.  Team characteristics for maximizing the educational effectiveness of practical lectures on software intensive systems development , 2013, 2013 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).

[13]  Gary Klein,et al.  Wanted:project teams with a blend of is professional orientations , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Norsaremah Salleh,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model , 2009, ESEM 2009.