Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course

The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous grouping as elements of cooperative learning in a college life science course. Cooperative learning may be defined as a classroom learning environment in which students work together in heterogeneous groups toward completion of some task. Cooperative incentive structures provide some type of group reward based on group products or individual learning. In heterogeneous grouping, students are arranged in order to maximize variety within groups. A 2 × 2 design was utilized in this study. The independent variables considered included (a) use of cooperative incentives in learning groups, and (b) use of heterogeneous grouping in cooperative learning groups. Dependent variables for all treatment groups were scores from a multiple-choice instrument developed for an earlier, related study, along with direct observational data on frequency of cooperative interactions. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used as the data analysis procedure for the achievement portion of the study, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis of the cooperative interaction portion of the study. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups.

[1]  R. Slavin Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: a reconciliation , 1987 .

[2]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  The relative effectiveness of cooperative and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening students' performance in science classes , 1985 .

[3]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Students Motivating Students to Excel: Cooperative Incentives, Cooperative Tasks, and Student Achievement , 1984, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  R. Slavin Group Rewards Make Groupwork Work , 1991 .

[5]  Scott B. Watson Cooperative learning and group educational modules: Effects on cognitive achievement of high school biology students , 1991 .

[6]  Ron Good,et al.  Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry , 1990 .

[7]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative CBI: The Effects of Heterogeneous versus Homogeneous Grouping on the Learning of Progressively Complex Concepts , 1988 .

[8]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  A comparative study of cooperative and competitive achievement in two secondary biology classrooms: The group investigation model versus an individually competitive goal structure , 1989 .

[9]  David L. DeVries,et al.  Team Competition and Group Practice: Effects on Student Achievement and Attitudes. Report No. 212. , 1976 .

[10]  R. Slavin When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships , 1985 .

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[13]  Simon Hooper,et al.  The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction , 1991 .

[14]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic science laboratory interaction patterns - effects on students' achievement and acquisition of practical skills , 1984 .

[15]  V. Martuza Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education , 1977 .

[16]  E. Aronson The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning on students' achievement in science class , 1982 .