Environmental and geometric drivers of small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in Utah

The mechanisms shaping patterns of biodiversity along spatial gradients remain poorly known and controversial. Hypotheses have emphasized the importance of both environmental and spatial factors. Much of the uncertainty about the relative role of these processes can be attributed to the limited number of comparative studies that evaluate multiple potential mechanisms. This study examines the relative importance of six variables: temperature, precipitation, productivity, habitat heterogeneity, area, and the mid-domain effect on patterns of species richness for non-volant small mammals along four neighboring mountain ranges in central Utah. Along each of these elevational gradients, a hump-shaped relationship of richness with elevation is evident. This study evaluates whether the processes shaping this common pattern are also common to all gradients. Model selection indicates that no one factor or set of factors best explains patterns of species richness across all gradients, and drivers of diversity may vary seasonally. These findings suggest that commonality in the pattern of species richness, even among elevational gradients with a similar biogeographic history and fauna, cannot be attributed to a simple universal explanation.

[1]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[2]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Patterns in the Balance of Nature , 1966 .

[3]  F. W. Preston.  The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[4]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in African birds , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[6]  L. Heaney.  Small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in the Philippines: an assessment of patterns and hypotheses , 2001 .

[7]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. Connell.  The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[9]  A. Shmida,et al.  Biological determinants of species diversity , 1985 .

[10]  J. Lobo,et al.  Regional and environmental effects on the species richness of mammal assemblages , 2008 .

[11]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .

[12]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[13]  G. Luck,et al.  Primary productivity and species richness: relationships among functional guilds, residency groups and vagility classes at multiple spatial scales , 2004 .

[14]  Qinghua Guo,et al.  The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal , 2002 .

[16]  Jia-kuan Chen,et al.  Elevational patterns of frog species richness and endemic richness in the Hengduan Mountains, China: geometric constraints, area and climate effects , 2006 .

[17]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results , 1999 .

[18]  K. Gaston,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect Revisited , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[19]  The Mammals of North America , 1959 .

[20]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Species Richness and Altitude: A Comparison between Null Models and Interpolated Plant Species Richness along the Himalayan Altitudinal Gradient, Nepal , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Lessard,et al.  Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains , 2007 .

[22]  Anne Lohrli.  Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[23]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[24]  E. Rickart.  Elevational diversity gradients, biogeography and the structure of montane mammal communities in the intermountain region of north America , 2001 .

[25]  M. Oommen,et al.  ELEVATIONAL SPECIES RICHNESS PATTERNS EMERGE FROM MULTIPLE LOCAL MECHANISMS IN HIMALAYAN WOODY PLANTS , 2005 .

[26]  C. Rahbek.  The role of spatial scale and the perception of large‐scale species‐richness patterns , 2004 .

[27]  N. Sanders,et al.  When does diversity fit null model predictions? Scale and range size mediate the mid‐domain effect , 2007 .

[28]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2003 .

[29]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[30]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[31]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Elevation gradients of species‐density: historical and prospective views , 2001 .

[32]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Nonbiological Gradients in Species Richness and a Spurious Rapoport Effect , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[33]  J. Lawton.  Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[34]  A. Huete,et al.  A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS , 1997 .

[35]  C. McCain.  The mid‐domain effect applied to elevational gradients: species richness of small mammals in Costa Rica , 2004 .

[36]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity , 2001 .

[37]  Rebecca J. Rowe,et al.  Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: a cautionary tale , 2005 .

[38]  N Thompson Hobbs,et al.  Alternatives to statistical hypothesis testing in ecology: a guide to self teaching. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[40]  C. McCain.  Area and mammalian elevational diversity. , 2007, Ecology.

[41]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Energy, range dynamics and global species richness patterns: reconciling mid-domain effects and environmental determinants of avian diversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[42]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevational gradient, Nepal , 2004 .

[43]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[44]  C. McCain.  ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS IN DIVERSITY OF SMALL MAMMALS , 2005 .

[45]  Howard J. Stains.  Comparison of Temperatures Inside and Outside Two Tree Dens Used by Racoons , 1961 .

[46]  R. Royall.  Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm , 1997 .

[47]  Robbin C. Moran,et al.  Species richness and distribution of ferns along an elevational gradient in Costa Rica , 2006 .

[48]  J. Terborgh.  Bird Species Diversity on an Andean Elevational Gradient , 1977 .

[49]  W. Jetz,et al.  Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[51]  L. Heaney,et al.  Distribution and Ecology of Small Mammals along an Elevational Transect in Southeastern Luzon, Philippines , 1991 .

[52]  Karen C. Seto,et al.  Linking spatial patterns of bird and butterfly species richness with Landsat TM derived NDVI , 2004 .

[53]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area Relationship , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[54]  R. Dunn,et al.  What drives elevational patterns of diversity? A test of geometric constraints, climate and species pool effects for pteridophytes on an elevational gradient in Costa Rica , 2006 .

[55]  S. Lidgard,et al.  Elevational gradients and species richness: do methods change pattern perception? , 2009 .

[56]  Allen H Hurlbert,et al.  The Effect of Energy and Seasonality on Avian Species Richness and Community Composition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[57]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[58]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[59]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  ESTIMATION OF CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHETIC AND NONPHOTOSYNTHETIC COMPONENTS FROM SPECTRAL TRANSMITTANCE , 2000 .

[60]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Topography, energy and the global distribution of bird species richness , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  C. Rahbek.  The Relationship Among Area, Elevation, And Regional Species Richness In Neotropical Birds , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[62]  N. Sanders.  Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule , 2002 .

[63]  E. White,et al.  Challenges in the application of geometric constraint models , 2007 .

[64]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Environmental and geometric constraints on Indo-Pacific coral reef biodiversity , 2005 .

[65]  Colwell,et al.  The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[66]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Species Richness Patterns:What Have We Learned So Far? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[67]  S. Herzog,et al.  The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: a foothill peak and a high‐elevation plateau , 2005 .