Sequential priming is not constrained by the shape of long-term learning curves

When multiple stimulus-to-response (S-R) mappings are randomly intermixed and repeated in a block of trials, immediate repetitions of an aspect of a stimulus and/or a response can facilitate stimulus detection, classification, and/or response selection—known assequential priming. In addition to these short-term effects, response times (RTs) for almost any task diminish with extended practice; improvements can occur over many days, and RT learning curves typically assume exponential or power functions. We investigated whether short-term sequential priming and long-term practice modulate RT through a common mechanism, using a variant of the additive factors method. We tracked how various priming effects, presumably affecting different processing stages (e.g., stimulus selection, stimulus identification/classification, and S-R mapping), varied over training sessions as RT diminished. All the priming effects either were not reduced or reduced approximately linearly at rates much slower than those predicted by the shapes of the corresponding RT learning curves. The overall results suggest that short-term sequential priming and long-term practice modulate RT through relatively separate mechanisms, even though they appear to affect a common set of behaviorally defined processing stages.

[1]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.

[2]  Charles S. Myers,et al.  On reaction times. , 1909 .

[3]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  Automaticity and preattentive processing. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning. I, Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks , 1991 .

[7]  B. Kröse,et al.  The control and speed of shifts of attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Fahle Human Pattern Recognition: Parallel Processing and Perceptual Learning , 1994, Perception.

[10]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[11]  M. Jarvik,et al.  Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Brace Fitting straight lines to experimental data. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  N. Kirby Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  E. Soetens,et al.  Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  Skill acquisition and repetition priming: One principle, many processes , 1996 .

[18]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  W. A. Wagenaar Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of literature. , 1972 .

[20]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural Learning : 1 . Locus of Practice Effects in Speeded Choice Tasks , 1991 .

[21]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[22]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  W. Chase,et al.  Sequential effects in choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[24]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. , 1991 .

[25]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[27]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[28]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[29]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. , 1993 .

[30]  A. Hillstrom Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[32]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Alphanumeric-Like Characters , 1997 .

[33]  G. Logan Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  N. Kirby Sequential effects in serial reaction time / [by] Neil H. Kirby , 1973 .

[35]  E. Soetens,et al.  Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time , 1985 .

[36]  E. Soetens,et al.  Spatial compatibility with a two-dimensional stimulus arrangement , 1984 .

[37]  G D Logan,et al.  Decomposing visual search: evidence of multiple item-specific skills. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval” , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  P Rabbitt,et al.  Modulation of Selective Attention by Sequential Effects in Visual Search Tasks , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  P M Rabbitt,et al.  Repetition Effects and Signal Classification Strategies in Serial Choice-Response Tasks , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  L. Boer,et al.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Subjective expectancy and automatic after- effect at short response-stimulus intervals☆ , 1980 .

[42]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Learning pop-out detection: building representations for conflicting target-distractor relationships , 1998, Vision Research.

[43]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[44]  J. R. Simon,et al.  CHOICE REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF ANGULAR STIMULUS-RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE AND AGE , 1963 .

[45]  T. Rickard Bending the power law : A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills , 1997 .

[46]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[47]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatization and training in visual search. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[48]  D. Bindra,et al.  Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments , 1970 .

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[50]  E. Soetens Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure , 1998 .

[51]  M C Smith,et al.  Repetition effect and short-term memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.