Adopting electronic medical records

Objective To understand the key challenges to adoption of advanced features of electronic medical records (EMRs) in office practice, and to better understand these challenges in a Canadian context. Design Mixed-methods study. Setting Manitoba. Participants Health care providers and staff in 5 primary care offices. Methods Level of EMR adoption was assessed, and field notes from interviews and discussion groups were qualitatively analyzed for common challenges and themes across all sites. Main findings Fifty-seven interviews and 4 discussion groups were conducted from November 2011 to January 2012. Electronic medical record adoption scores ranged from 2.3 to 3.0 (out of a theoretical maximum of 5). Practices often scored lower than expected on use of decision support, providing patients with access to their own data, and use of practice-reporting tools. Qualitative analysis showed there were ceiling effects to EMR adoption owing to how the EMR was implemented, the supporting eHealth infrastructure, lack of awareness or availability of EMR functionality, and poor EMR data quality. Conclusion Many practitioners used their EMRs as “electronic paper records” and were not using advanced features of their EMRs that could further enhance practice. Data-quality issues within the EMRs could affect future attempts at using these features. Education and quality improvement activities to support data quality and EMR optimization are likely needed to support practices in maximizing their use of EMRs.

[1]  Patricia Sullivan-Taylor,et al.  Development of a Draft Pan-Canadian Primary Health Care Electronic Medical Record Content Standard , 2011, ITCH.

[2]  Patrick J O'Connor,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[3]  Bart J. Harvey,et al.  Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study. , 2011, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[4]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Suzanne C Biro,et al.  Trends in the use of electronic medical records. , 2012, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[7]  John Doucette,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[9]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[10]  Morgan Price,et al.  Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[11]  M. Brisson.  Alberta's Personal Health Portal , 2011, Healthcare management forum.

[12]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[13]  Anne Holbrook,et al.  Model Formulation: Methodologic Issues in Health Informatics Trials: The Complexities of Complex Interventions , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[15]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Jan Barnsley,et al.  Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study. , 2011, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[17]  Genna R. Cohen,et al.  Are Electronic Medical Records Helpful for Care Coordination? Experiences of Physician Practices , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Overdependence on Technology: An Unintended Adverse Consequence of Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2007, AMIA.

[19]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Review Paper: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  An Electronic Medical Record in Primary Care: Impact on Satisfaction, Work Efficiency and Clinic Processes , 2006, AMIA.