Testing the validity of the paddle method for the kinesthetic and visual-kinesthetic perception of inclination

We tested the validity of the paddle method for measuring both the kinesthetic and visual-kinesthetic perception of inclination. In three conditions, subjects performed three different tasks: (1) rotating a manual paddle to a set of verbally given inclinations (blindfolded subjects), (2) rotating a manual paddle to the same set of verbally given inclinations after specific kinesthetic training (blindfolded subjects), and (3) rotating the paddle to a set of fixed visual inclinations after the kinesthetic training. The results showed a high degree of accuracy and precision in the second and third task but not in the first one. When subjects were asked to rotate a manual paddle to a set of verbally given inclinations, they used three main anchors (0°, 45°, 90°). Furthermore, the paddle method is biased by a kinesthetic deficiency, namely a rotational problem of the wrist that can be corrected by means of specific training.

[1]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  F Lacquaniti,et al.  A hybrid frame of reference for visuo-manual coordination. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[3]  J. Gibson.  The perception of visual surfaces. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Internal frame of reference as a determinant of the oblique effect. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R. Phillips.  Stationary Visual Texture and the Estimation of Slant Angle , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Mike Harris,et al.  Retinal speed gradients and the perception of surface slant , 1992, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Payne,et al.  Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments , 1969 .

[8]  M. Turvey,et al.  The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  E. Gentaz,et al.  The Haptic ‘Oblique Effect’ in Children's and Adults' Perception of Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[10]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Cue Conflict and Stereoscopic Surface Slant about Horizontal and Vertical Axes , 1994, Perception.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  Aftereffect of inspection of a perspectival stimulus for slant depth: A new normalization effect , 1974 .

[12]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[13]  R. B. Freeman.  Effect of size on visual slant. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Binocular Perception of Slant about Oblique Axes Relative to a Visual Frame of Reference , 1995, Perception.

[15]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Perceiving geographical slant , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.