Identification of Linear Climate Models from the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble

Abstract In this paper, we investigate an ensemble of atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) participating in phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3), and whose dynamic behavior is emulated by the reduced-complexity climate model MAGICC6. Using a superimposed impulse in solar radiative forcing for the purposes of system identification, we identify 12 AOGCMs in the CMIP3 ensemble for which low-order linear, time-invariant (LTI) models are able to very closely approximate MAGICC6 surface temperature projections under each of the four greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenarios known as the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), even when extended to centennial timescales. The linear climate models identified in this paper are suitable for the analysis of feedback-based approaches to mitigation aimed at stabilizing global-mean surface temperature, and will inform future quantitative assessment of closed-loop approaches to geoengineering of the climate based on solar radiation management (SRM).

[1]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[2]  G. Peters,et al.  Atmosphere Response Time Scales Estimated from AOGCM Experiments , 2012 .

[3]  P. Young,et al.  A robust sequential CO 2 emissions strategy based on optimal control of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations , 2005 .

[4]  T. Wigley,et al.  Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration , 2011 .

[5]  Douglas G. MacMartin,et al.  Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[6]  James D. Annan,et al.  Understanding the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble , 2011 .

[7]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[8]  Andy Jarvis,et al.  Long run surface temperature dynamics of an A-OGCM: the HadCM3 4×CO2 forcing experiment revisited , 2009 .

[9]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Stabilizing global mean surface temperature: A feedback control perspective , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  A. Jarvis,et al.  Climate–society feedbacks and the avoidance of dangerous climate change , 2012 .

[11]  Peter C. Young,et al.  A robust sequential CO2 emissions strategy based on optimal control of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 2008 .

[12]  Brett Ninness,et al.  UNIT: A freely available system identification toolbox , 2013 .

[13]  D. Saint‐Martin,et al.  Transient Climate Response in a Two-Layer Energy-Balance Model. Part I: Analytical Solution and Parameter Calibration Using CMIP5 AOGCM Experiments , 2013 .

[14]  S. Levitus,et al.  World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change (0–2000 m), 1955–2010 , 2012 .

[15]  T. Wigley,et al.  Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios , 1992, Nature.

[16]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[17]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0 – Part 1: Description and evaluation , 2011 .

[18]  T. Lenton,et al.  The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options , 2009 .

[19]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[20]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[21]  Jason Lowe,et al.  Abrupt CO2 experiments as tools for predicting and understanding CMIP5 representative concentration pathway projections , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[22]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Projections of the pace of warming following an abrupt increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration , 2013 .