Online brain attenuation correction in PET: towards a fully automated data handling in a clinical environment

We have improved the calculation of the brain attenuation correction in positron emission tomography (PET) and set up a procedure which allows the clinician to get a fully corrected image in a single reconstruction step, without human intervention. By using a general object description scheme based on polygonal contour trees we are able to calculate the attenuation correction for brain tissue, bone and head holder. The head contour is generated from the emission sinogram. On a set of 15 adult patients, the emission values obtained using this calculated attenuation compare favorably with those obtained with an attenuation resulting from a transmission measurement. Residual discrepancies are attributed to incomplete scatter compensation between emission and transmission. The robustness of the algorithm has been tested on more than 100 brain fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) studies in adult patients, including pathological cases. Its applicability for18FDG studies in children and for other tracer such as water (H215O) and fluoroethylspiperone (18FESP) is also presented.

[1]  M Hosoba,et al.  Automated body contour detection in SPECT: effects on quantitative studies. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Imaging Properties of a Positron Tomograph with 280 Bgo Crystals , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Problems in Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Attenuation Correction in High Resolution PET , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  E. Hoffman,et al.  A BOUNDARY METHOD FOR ATTENUATION CORRECTION IN POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 1981, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  C. Bohm,et al.  Determination of Object Contour from Projections for Attenuation Correction in Cranial Positron Emission Tomography , 1982, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 2. Effects of inaccurate attenuation correction. , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  W. Moses,et al.  Orbiting transmission source for positron tomography , 1988 .

[9]  C. Bohm,et al.  Correction for Scattered Radiation in a Ring Detector Positron Camera by Integral Transformation of the Projections , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Paul Wintz,et al.  Digital image processing (2nd ed.) , 1987 .

[11]  G Germano,et al.  Investigation of count rate and deadtime characteristics of a high resolution PET system. , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Dynamic, Gated and High Resolution Imaging with the ECAT III , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  M R Palmer,et al.  Scatter distribution in transmission measurements with positron emission tomography. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[15]  T. Tomitani An Edge Detection Algorithm for Attenuation Correction in Emission CT , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  H.M. Wechsler,et al.  Digital image processing, 2nd ed. , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  H. Kretschmann,et al.  Neuroanatomy and Cranial Computed Tomography , 1986 .

[18]  P. King,et al.  Noise Identification and Removal in Positron Imaging Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Z H Cho,et al.  Positron ranges obtained from biomedically important positron-emitting radionuclides. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.