Examining Online Learning Patterns with Data Mining Techniques in Peer-Moderated and Teacher-Moderated Courses

The student learning process is important in online learning environments. If instructors can “observe” online learning behaviors, they can provide adaptive feedback, adjust instructional strategies, and assist students in establishing patterns of successful learning activities. This study used data mining techniques to examine and compare learning patterns between peer-moderated and teacher-moderated groups from a recently completed experimental study (Zhang, Peng, & Hung, 2009). The online behaviors of the students from the Zhang et al. study were analyzed to determine why teacher-moderated groups performed significantly better than peer-moderated groups. Three data mining techniques—clustering analysis, association rule analysis, and decision tree analysis—were used for data analysis. The results showed that most students in the peer-moderated condition had low participation levels and relied on student-content interaction only. On the other hand, teacher presence promoted student interaction with multiple sources (content, student, and teacher). The findings demonstrate the potential of data mining techniques to support teaching and learning.

[1]  Jon F. Schamber,et al.  Assessing and Improving the Quality of Group Critical Thinking Exhibited in the Final Projects of Collaborative Learning Groups , 2006, The Journal of General Education.

[2]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy and motivation to study , 1993 .

[3]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement , 2004 .

[4]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[5]  Dannelle D. Stevens,et al.  Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning , 2004 .

[6]  Jui-Long Hung,et al.  Online collaborative learning in a project‐based learning environment in Taiwan: a case study on undergraduate students’ perspectives , 2009 .

[7]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research , 2002 .

[8]  Raul Wirz,et al.  Online Competitions: An Open Space to Improve the Learning Process , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Xiaojing Liu,et al.  The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students' learning and virtual team performance , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  Evaluating Distributed Learning In Metropolitan Universities , 2001 .

[11]  Katsutoshi Yada,et al.  CODIRO: A New System for Obtaining Data Concerning Consumer Behavior Based on Data Factors of High Interest Determined by the Analyst , 2007, Soft Comput..

[12]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[13]  P. Shea,et al.  A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Charlotte L. Neuhauser.  Learning Style and Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction , 2002 .

[15]  Mark K. Singley,et al.  Scaffolding group learning in a collaborative networked environment , 2002, CSCL.

[16]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Web Usage Mining for a Better Web-Based Learning Environment , 2001 .

[17]  W. Lens,et al.  'Learning to learn': teachers' conceptions of their supporting role , 2002 .

[18]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  A test‐retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes , 1995 .

[20]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[21]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Data Mining Methods, Applications, and Tools , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[22]  Richard J. Roiger,et al.  Data Mining: A Tutorial Based Primer , 2002 .

[23]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Adaptive Business Intelligence , 2009, Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence.

[24]  Laura J. Christensen,et al.  The Linear Relationship between Student Reports of Teacher Immediacy Behaviors and Perceptions of State Motivation, and of Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Learning. , 1998 .

[25]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Collaborative processes during report writing of a science learning project: The nature of discourse as a function of task requirements , 2000 .

[26]  Ronen Feldman,et al.  The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook , 2005 .

[27]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[28]  G. V. Kass.  An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data , 1980 .

[29]  B. Lockee,et al.  Old Concerns with New Distance Education Research , 2001 .

[30]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Data Mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Barbara N. Martin,et al.  Do Gender and Learning Style Play a Role in How Online Courses Should Be Designed , 2005 .

[32]  A. Wise,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Social Presence on Student Satisfaction, Engagement, and Learning , 2004, ICLS.

[33]  W. Randall Thomas,et al.  Online Project-Based Learning: How Collaborative Strategies and Problem Solving Processes Impact Performance , 2005 .

[34]  K. Lund.  Human support in CSCL: what, for whom, and by whom? , 2004 .

[35]  Doug Riecken,et al.  Introduction: personalized views of personalization , 2000, CACM.

[36]  D. Perkins,et al.  Chapter 1: Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[37]  Karin Becker,et al.  Applying Web Usage Mining For The Analysis OfBehavior In Web-based Learning Environments , 2006 .

[38]  Karin Becker,et al.  Distance education: a Web usage mining case study for the evaluation of learning sites , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[39]  Tiffany A. Koszalka,et al.  Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[40]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[41]  Rex E. Wallace,et al.  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 , 2001 .