Exploring the Sensitivity of Sampling Density in Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Application in Soil Sampling

The rapid monitoring and accurate estimation of dynamic changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) can make great efforts in understanding the global carbon cycle. Traditional field survey is the main approach to obtain soil data and measure SOC content. However, the limited number of soil samples and the sampling cost hinder the quality of digital soil mapping. This research aims to explore the sensitive of sampling density in digital soil mapping, and then design a suitable soil sampling plan based on a series of sampling indices. Headwall hyperspectral images (400–1700 nm) were used to estimate the SOC map by partial least squares regression (PLSR) and PLSR kriging (PLSRK). Three traditional soil sampling methods (random, grid, and Latin hypercube sampling) with 10 classes of sampling densities (6.26, 2.79, 1.57, 1.01, 0.69, 0.53, 0.39, 0.30, 0.26, and 0.20 ha−1) were designed. The R2, root mean square error (RMSE) and ratio of standard deviation to RMSE (RPD) were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy in digital soil mapping by ordinary kriging. Three new indices, namely, the ratio of sampling efficiency to performance (RSEP), the density of soil samples index and the comprehensive evaluation index of prediction accuracy, were used to select a suitable soil sampling plan. Results showed that (1) the prediction accuracy of PLSRK (RPD = 2.00) was higher by approximately 11.73% than that of PLSR (RPD = 1.79), and the hyperspectral images provided an actual referential SOC map for the study of soil sampling; (2) the grid sampling plan performed better than the random and Latin hypercube sampling methods, and the quality of SOC map improves with the increase of the sampling density, and (3) the computer simulation and field verification indicated that RSEP is one feasible index in designing a suitable soil sampling plan.

[1]  L. Wilding,et al.  Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys , 1985 .

[2]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[3]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging , 1988 .

[4]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[5]  J. Mickelson,et al.  Assessment of soil sampling methods to estimate wild oat (Avena fatua) seed bank populations , 2003, Weed Science.

[6]  P. L. Mask,et al.  Soil Sampling Techniques for Alabama, USA Grain Fields , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Alexander Gribov,et al.  Geostatistical Mapping with Continuous Moving Neighborhood , 2004 .

[8]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle , 2006 .

[9]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  Bernard Tychon,et al.  Detection of carbon stock change in agricultural soils using spectroscopic techniques , 2006 .

[11]  Lênio Soares Galvão,et al.  Relationships between the mineralogical and chemical composition of tropical soils and topography from hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2008 .

[12]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: An Australian case study , 2008 .

[13]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Comparison of multivariate methods for inferential modeling of soil carbon using visible/near-infrared spectra , 2008 .

[14]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data , 2008 .

[15]  A. McBratney,et al.  Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy , 2010 .

[16]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Digital soil mapping: bridging research, environmental application, and operation , 2010 .

[17]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Proximal Soil Sensing , 2010 .

[18]  Charlie Chen,et al.  Digitally mapping the information content of visible–near infrared spectra of surficial Australian soils , 2011 .

[19]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Soil Organic Carbon mapping of partially vegetated agricultural fields with imaging spectroscopy , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[20]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Applying blind source separation on hyperspectral data for clay content estimation over partially vegetated surfaces , 2011 .

[21]  Xuezheng Shi,et al.  Effect of Soil Sampling Density on Detected Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon in a Red Soil Region of China , 2011 .

[22]  Bas van Wesemael,et al.  Soil Organic Carbon Predictions by Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy: Comparing Cross-Validation and Validation , 2012 .

[23]  Rattan Lal,et al.  A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock , 2012 .

[24]  Chuanrong Zhang,et al.  Predictive mapping of soil total nitrogen at a regional scale: A comparison between geographically weighted regression and cokriging , 2013 .

[25]  Peihong Fu,et al.  Modeling of spatial distributions of farmland density and its temporal change using geographically weighted regression model , 2014, Chinese Geographical Science.

[26]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA , 2013, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[27]  Claudy Jolivet,et al.  Which strategy is best to predict soil properties of a local site from a national Vis–NIR database? , 2014 .

[28]  Cindy Ong,et al.  Using airborne hyperspectral data to characterize the surface pH and mineralogy of pyrite mine tailings , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[29]  Guofeng Wu,et al.  Visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-an alternative for monitoring soil contamination by heavy metals. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[30]  O. Sokolova,et al.  Development of rapid method for determining the total carbon in boron carbide samples with elemental analyzer , 2014, Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry.

[31]  Yunqiang Zhu,et al.  Mapping the mean annual precipitation of China using local interpolation techniques , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[32]  Y. Torigoe,et al.  Impact of a soil sampling strategy on the spatial distribution and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal communities at a small scale in two winter cover crop rotational systems , 2015, Annals of Microbiology.

[33]  Bernard Tychon,et al.  Soil organic carbon assessment by field and airborne spectrometry in bare croplands: accounting for soil surface roughness , 2014 .

[34]  Juha Suomalainen,et al.  Estimating Plant Traits of Grasslands from UAV-Acquired Hyperspectral Images: A Comparison of Statistical Approaches , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[35]  Michael Bock,et al.  System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4 , 2015 .

[36]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  On the Feasibility of Characterizing Soil Properties From AVIRIS Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  R. A. Viscarra Rossel,et al.  Soil organic carbon and its fractions estimated by visible–near infrared transfer functions , 2015 .

[38]  D. Bui,et al.  A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. , 2015 .

[39]  Sébastien Lambot,et al.  Improved estimation of soil clay content by the fusion of remote hyperspectral and proximal geophysical sensing , 2015 .

[40]  Rémy Fieuzal,et al.  Improvement of Soil Moisture Retrieval from Hyperspectral VNIR-SWIR Data Using Clay Content Information: From Laboratory to Field Experiments , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  José A. M. Demattê,et al.  Prediction of soil properties using imaging spectroscopy: Considering fractional vegetation cover to improve accuracy , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[42]  Emmanuelle Vaudour,et al.  Early-season mapping of crops and cultural operations using very high spatial resolution Pléiades images , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[43]  Zhou Shi,et al.  Improved estimates of organic carbon using proximally sensed vis–NIR spectra corrected by piecewise direct standardization , 2015 .

[44]  Eyal Ben-Dor,et al.  Mapping the Spectral Soil Quality Index (SSQI) Using Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[45]  P. Lagacherie,et al.  Semi-blind source separation for the estimation of the clay content over semi-vegetated areas using VNIR/SWIR hyperspectral airborne data , 2016 .

[46]  Kacem Chehdi,et al.  Regional prediction of soil organic carbon content over temperate croplands using visible near-infrared airborne hyperspectral imagery and synchronous field spectra , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[47]  Giorgio Matteucci,et al.  Effect of calibration set size on prediction at local scale of soil carbon by Vis-NIR spectroscopy , 2017 .

[48]  Juanjo Peón,et al.  Evaluation of the spectral characteristics of five hyperspectral and multispectral sensors for soil organic carbon estimation in burned areas , 2017 .

[49]  Yaolin Liu,et al.  Comparisons of spatial and non-spatial models for predicting soil carbon content based on visible and near-infrared spectral technology , 2017 .

[50]  G. Matteucci,et al.  Using laboratory Vis-NIR spectroscopy for monitoring some forest soil properties , 2018, Journal of Soils and Sediments.

[51]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Optimising prediction of forest leaf area index from discrete airborne lidar , 2017 .