Online model- and data-based leakage localization in district heating networks - Impact of random measurement errors

Pipe bursts and leaks in district heating networks are a problem both for the economic operation and for the supply reliability of the connected consumers. In case of a leakage, pressure and flow rate conditions near the defect change. These changes spread to the entire network within a short period of time and, depending on the size of the leakage, partly lead to drastically changed network conditions. After a leakage is detected, it is necessary to localize the leakage as accurate as possible in order to shut down the affected network segment and maintain the network’s stability. This article discusses and compares three different approaches for leakage localization (pressure wave detection, model-based numeric-analytical and machine learning) that exploit different properties of simulation models and sensor information from the real network.

[1]  Algirdas Kaliatka,et al.  Study and demonstration of pressure wave-based leak detection in a district heating network , 2018 .

[2]  Francesco Archetti,et al.  Analytical Leakages Localization in Water Distribution Networks through Spectral Clustering and Support Vector MACHINES. The Icewater Approach , 2014 .

[3]  Karim Salahshoor,et al.  Pipeline leakage detection and isolation: An integrated approach of statistical and wavelet feature extraction with multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) , 2016 .

[4]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[5]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Leak localization in water distribution networks using Bayesian classifiers , 2017 .

[6]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[7]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Leak localization in water distribution networks using a mixed model-based/data-driven approach , 2016 .

[8]  Frank Klawonn,et al.  Online Leakage Attribution to Exclusion Areas Prototype Application , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[9]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Wojciech Moczulski,et al.  SysDetLok - a leakage detection and localization system for water distribution networks , 2018 .

[11]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: Improving classification performance when training data is skewed , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Zheng O'Neill,et al.  A review of leakage detection methods for district heating networks , 2018 .

[13]  Yun Chi,et al.  Learning Naive Bayes Classifier from Noisy Data , 2003 .

[14]  Hao Ye,et al.  Analysis of the smallest detectable leakage flow rate of negative pressure wave-based leak detection systems for liquid pipelines , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Michael Felsberg,et al.  Enhanced analysis of thermographic images for monitoring of district heat pipe networks , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[17]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Leak Localization in Water Distribution Networks using Pressure Residuals and Classifiers , 2015 .

[18]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  A novel data-driven leak detection and localization algorithm using the Kantorovich distance , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..