Mapping behavioral landscapes for animal movement: a finite mixture modeling approach.

Because of its role in many ecological processes, movement of animals in response to landscape features is an important subject in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper, we develop models of animal movement in relation to objects or fields in a landscape. We took a finite mixture modeling approach in which the component densities are conceptually related to different choices for movement in response to a landscape feature, and the mixing proportions are related to the probability of selecting each response as a function of one or more covariates. We combined particle swarm optimization and an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to obtain maximum-likelihood estimates of the model parameters. We used this approach to analyze data for movement of three bobcats in relation to urban areas in southern California, USA. A behavioral interpretation of the models revealed similarities and differences in bobcat movement response to urbanization. All three bobcats avoided urbanization by moving either parallel to urban boundaries or toward less urban areas as the proportion of urban land cover in the surrounding area increased. However, one bobcat, a male with a dispersal-like large-scale movement pattern, avoided urbanization at lower densities and responded strictly by moving parallel to the urban edge. The other two bobcats, which were both residents and occupied similar geographic areas, avoided urban areas using a combination of movements parallel to the urban edge and movement toward areas of less urbanization. However, the resident female appeared to exhibit greater repulsion at lower levels of urbanization than the resident male, consistent with empirical observations of bobcats in southern California. Using the parameterized finite mixture models, we mapped behavioral states to geographic space, creating a representation of a behavioral landscape. This approach can provide guidance for conservation planning based on analysis of animal movement data using statistical models, thereby linking connectivity evaluations to empirical data.

[1]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Benjamin D. Dalziel,et al.  Fitting Probability Distributions to Animal Movement Trajectories: Using Artificial Neural Networks to Link Distance, Resources, and Memory , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Modeling and inference of animal movement using artificial neural networks , 2011, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[4]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[5]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[7]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1994, Neural Computation.

[8]  M. Sunquist,et al.  Ecological Constraints on Predation by Large Felids , 1989 .

[9]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[10]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[11]  A. Dobson,et al.  Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States , 1997, Science.

[12]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[13]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[14]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Agent-Based Inference for Animal Movement and Selection , 2010 .

[15]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Behavioral responses of bobcats and coyotes to habitat fragmentation and corridors in an urban environment , 2002 .

[16]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Highly Variable Spread Rates in Replicated Biological Invasions: Fundamental Limits to Predictability , 2009, Science.

[18]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Dale L. Zimmerman,et al.  An animal movement model incorporating home range and habitat selection , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts , 1991, Neural Computation.

[21]  C. W. Kilpatrick,et al.  Kinship and social structure of bobcats (Lynx rufus) inferred from microsatellite and radio-telemetry data , 2006 .

[22]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. , 2009, Ecology.

[23]  S. Gehrt,et al.  Urban carnivores : ecology, conflict, and conservation , 2010 .

[24]  R. Wayne,et al.  Effects of Urbanization and Habitat Fragmentation on Bobcats and Coyotes in Southern California , 2003 .

[25]  Lucas N Joppa,et al.  Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[26]  K. Crooks Relative Sensitivities of Mammalian Carnivores to Habitat Fragmentation , 2002 .

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[28]  Jun Zhu,et al.  A set of nonlinear regression models for animal movement in response to a single landscape feature , 2005 .

[29]  J. Tracey Connectivity Conservation: Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity , 2006 .

[30]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[31]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation , 2008 .

[32]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[33]  K. Sullivan,et al.  Elucidating spatially explicit behavioral landscapes in the Willow Flycatcher , 2012 .

[34]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Distinguishing between elementary orientation mechanisms by means of path analysis , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  B. Roitberg Searching Behavior: the Behavioral Ecology of Finding Resources , 1992 .

[36]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  B. Czech,et al.  Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States , 2000 .

[38]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[39]  W. Clark,et al.  Space Use and Habitat Selection by Bobcats in the Fragmented Landscape of South-Central Iowa , 2008 .

[40]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[41]  R. Wayne,et al.  FAST‐TRACK: A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[42]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks , 2006 .

[43]  Rudolf Jander,et al.  Ecological aspects of spatial orientation , 1975 .

[44]  Jacqueline L. Frair,et al.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.