Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans

Significance Do animals encode statistical information about visual patterns the same way as humans do? If so, humans’ superior visual cognitive skills must depend on some other factors; if not, the nature of the differences can provide hints about what makes human learning so versatile. We provide a systematic comparison of automatic visual learning in humans and honey bees, showing that while bees do extract statistical information about co-occurrence contingencies of visual scenes, in contrast to humans, they do not automatically encode conditional information. Thus, acquiring implicit knowledge about the statistical properties of the visual environment may be a general mechanism in animals, but the richer representation developed automatically by humans might require specific probabilistic computational faculties. The ability of developing complex internal representations of the environment is considered a crucial antecedent to the emergence of humans’ higher cognitive functions. Yet it is an open question whether there is any fundamental difference in how humans and other good visual learner species naturally encode aspects of novel visual scenes. Using the same modified visual statistical learning paradigm and multielement stimuli, we investigated how human adults and honey bees (Apis mellifera) encode spontaneously, without dedicated training, various statistical properties of novel visual scenes. We found that, similarly to humans, honey bees automatically develop a complex internal representation of their visual environment that evolves with accumulation of new evidence even without a targeted reinforcement. In particular, with more experience, they shift from being sensitive to statistics of only elemental features of the scenes to relying on co-occurrence frequencies of elements while losing their sensitivity to elemental frequencies, but they never encode automatically the predictivity of elements. In contrast, humans involuntarily develop an internal representation that includes single-element and co-occurrence statistics, as well as information about the predictivity between elements. Importantly, capturing human visual learning results requires a probabilistic chunk-learning model, whereas a simple fragment-based memory-trace model that counts occurrence summary statistics is sufficient to replicate honey bees’ learning behavior. Thus, humans’ sophisticated encoding of sensory stimuli that provides intrinsic sensitivity to predictive information might be one of the fundamental prerequisites of developing higher cognitive abilities.

[1]  Evgeny Osipov,et al.  Imitation of honey bees’ concept learning processes using Vector Symbolic Architectures , 2015, BICA 2015.

[2]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Michael B. Reiser,et al.  Neural correlates of illusory motion perception in Drosophila , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Aurore Avarguès-Weber,et al.  Higher‐order discrimination learning by honeybees in a virtual environment , 2019, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  H. Roitblat,et al.  Comparative cognition: representations and processes in learning and memory. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  J. Reinhard,et al.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  R. Menzel Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. , 2001, Learning & memory.

[9]  A. Avarguès-Weber,et al.  Does Holistic Processing Require a Large Brain? Insights From Honeybees and Wasps in Fine Visual Recognition Tasks , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[10]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Evidence for counting in insects , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[11]  Andreas Nieder Honey bees zero in on the empty set , 2018, Science.

[12]  R. Aslin,et al.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Grouping of visual objects by honeybees , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  A. Dyer The mysterious cognitive abilities of bees: why models of visual processing need to consider experience and individual differences in animal performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  D. Premack Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Conceptual learning by miniature brains , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  R. Menzel The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Cognition: Your face looks familiar , 2012, Nature.

[19]  A. Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Shettleworth Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Simultaneous mastering of two abstract concepts by the miniature brain of bees , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Srinivasan Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. , 2010, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  Aurore Avarguès-Weber,et al.  Numerical cognition in honeybees enables addition and subtraction , 2019, Science Advances.

[24]  M. Giurfa An Insect’s Sense of Number , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  H. Lachnit,et al.  The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Insect-Inspired Sequential Inspection Strategy Enables an Artificial Network of Four Neurons to Estimate Numerosity , 2018, iScience.

[27]  Jair E. Garcia,et al.  Surpassing the subitizing threshold: appetitive–aversive conditioning improves discrimination of numerosities in honeybees , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[29]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[30]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Configural processing enables discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Adrian G. Dyer,et al.  Free-flying honeybees extrapolate relational size rules to sort successively visited artificial flowers in a realistic foraging situation , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Jair E. Garcia,et al.  Through the eyes of a bee: seeing the world as a whole , 2016 .

[34]  M. Giurfa,et al.  A test of transitive inferences in free-flying honeybees: unsuccessful performance due to memory constraints. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[35]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Visual cognition in social insects. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[36]  Jair E. Garcia,et al.  Symbolic representation of numerosity by honeybees (Apis mellifera): matching characters to small quantities , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[37]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[38]  M. Giurfa,et al.  The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Jair E. Garcia,et al.  Numerical ordering of zero in honey bees , 2018, Science.

[40]  A. Avarguès-Weber Face Recognition: Lessons from a Wasp , 2012, Current Biology.

[41]  J. B. Trobalon,et al.  Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[43]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of? , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  R. Menzel,et al.  Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[45]  J. Niven,et al.  Are Bigger Brains Better? , 2009, Current Biology.

[46]  Adrian G. Dyer,et al.  Conceptualization of relative size by honeybees , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[47]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[48]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks , 2016, Current Biology.

[49]  M. Giurfa Honeybees foraging for numbers , 2019, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  Adrian G Dyer,et al.  Honeybees can recognise images of complex natural scenes for use as potential landmarks , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  Adrian G. Dyer,et al.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  H. Lachnit,et al.  Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: negative and positive patterning discrimination. , 2001, Learning & memory.

[54]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Constraints on Statistical Learning Across Species , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Adrian G Dyer,et al.  Seeing near and seeing far; behavioural evidence for dual mechanisms of pattern vision in the honeybee (Apis mellifera) , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[56]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Local-feature assembling in visual pattern recognition and generalization in honeybees , 2004, Nature.

[57]  Eleni Vasilaki,et al.  Abstract concept learning in a simple neural network inspired by the insect brain , 2018, bioRxiv.

[58]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[59]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Maze Learning by Honeybees , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[60]  H. Lachnit,et al.  Nonelemental visual learning in honeybees , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  Elizabeth A. Tibbetts,et al.  Specialized Face Learning Is Associated with Individual Recognition in Paper Wasps , 2011, Science.

[62]  Quoc C. Vuong,et al.  Insect Brains Use Image Interpolation Mechanisms to Recognise Rotated Objects , 2008, PloS one.

[63]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[64]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[65]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Aversive Reinforcement Improves Visual Discrimination Learning in Free-Flying Honeybees , 2010, PloS one.

[66]  M. Giurfa Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[67]  A. Avarguès-Weber,et al.  Sameness/difference spiking neural circuit as a relational concept precursor model: A bio-inspired robotic implementation , 2017, BICA 2017.

[68]  L. Chittka,et al.  Animal Cognition: Concepts from Apes to Bees , 2011, Current Biology.

[69]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[70]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Zebra finches can use positional and transitional cues to distinguish vocal element strings , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[71]  Richard F. Thompson In search of memory traces. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[72]  Nathan J Emery,et al.  Therapy for Specific Problems Therapy for Specific Problems : Youth Tobacco Cessation , 2009 .

[73]  E. Newport,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[74]  J. Tautz,et al.  Number-Based Visual Generalisation in the Honeybee , 2009, PloS one.

[75]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[76]  Transfer from Number to Size Reveals Abstract Coding of Magnitude in Honeybees , 2020, iScience.