Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy: clinical implementation and application.

The clinical implementation and application of a novel treatment planning system (TPS) for scanned ion beams is described, which is in clinical use for carbon ion treatments at the German heavy ion facility (GSI). All treatment plans are evaluated on the basis of biologically effective dose distributions. For therapy control, in-beam positron emission tomography (PET) and an online monitoring system for the beam intensity and position are used. The absence of a gantry restricts the treatment plans to horizontal beams. Most of the treatment plans consist of two nearly opposing lateral fields or sometimes orthogonal fields. In only a very few cases a single beam was used. For patients with very complex target volumes lateral and even distal field patching techniques were applied. Additional improvements can be achieved when the patient's head is fixed in a tilted position, in order to achieve sparing of the organs at risk. In order to test the stability of dose distributions in the case of patient misalignments we routinely simulate the effects of misalignments for patients with critical structures next to the target volume. The uncertainties in the range calculation are taken into account by a margin around the target volume of typically 2-3 mm, which can, however, be extended if the simulation demonstrates larger deviations. The novel TPS developed for scanned ion beams was introduced into clinical routine in December 1997 and was used for the treatment planning of 63 patients with head and neck tumours until July 2000. Planning strategies and methods were developed for this tumour location that facilitate the treatment of a larger number of patients with the scanned heavy ion beam in a clinical setting. Further developments aim towards a simultaneous optimization of the treatment field intensities and more effective procedures for the patient set-up. The results demonstrate that ion beams can be integrated into a clinical environment for treatment planning and delivery.

[1]  W Schlegel,et al.  Stereotactically guided fractionated radiotherapy: technical aspects. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  J Rassow,et al.  Quality assurance for a treatment planning system in scanned ion beam therapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  O Jäkel,et al.  Selection of beam angles for radiotherapy of skull base tumours using charged particles. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M Scholz,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  O Jäkel,et al.  A system for three-dimensional dosimetric verification of treatment plans in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with heavy ions. , 1999, Medical physics.

[6]  S Minohara,et al.  Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  W Enghardt,et al.  The investigation of different cameras for in-beam PET imaging. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  W Schlegel,et al.  Computer systems and mechanical tools for stereotactically guided conformation therapy with linear accelerators. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  A L Boyer,et al.  Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  O Jäkel,et al.  Quality management of medical physics issues at the German heavy ion therapy project. , 2000, Medical physics.

[11]  P Xia,et al.  Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  T. Renner,et al.  Clinical gain from improved beam delivery systems , 1992, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[13]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  G T Chen,et al.  Beam scanning for heavy charged particle radiotherapy. , 1983, Medical physics.

[15]  R Mohan,et al.  The role of uncertainty analysis in treatment planning. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[17]  O Jäkel,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.

[19]  Wolfgang Schlegel,et al.  DREIDIMENSIONALE BESTRAHLUNGSPLANUNG. UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZUR KLINISCHEN INTEGRATION , 1993 .

[20]  Shinichi Minohara,et al.  HIPLAN-A HEAVY ION TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM AT HIMAC , 1996 .

[21]  G. Chen,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.