Using Analogies to Improve the Teaching Performance of Preservice Teachers.

Prior research in both education and cognitive science has identified analogy making as a powerful tool for explanation as well as a fundamental mechanism for facilitating an individual's construction of knowledge. While a considerable body of research exists focusing on the role analogy plays in learning science concepts, relatively little is known about how instruction in the use of analogies might influence the teaching performance of preservice teachers. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between pedagogical analogy use and pedagogical reasoning ability in a sample of preservice elementary teachers (PTs), a group that has been identified for their particular difficulties in teaching science. The study utilized a treatment/contrast group design in which the treatment group was provided instruction that guided them in the generation of analogies to aid in the explanation phase of learning cycle lessons. A relationship between analogy use and positive indicants of teaching performance was observed and a case study of a low performing preservice teacher who drastically improved teaching performance using analogy-based pedagogy is presented. A notable effect on conceptual understanding of Newton's Third Law as a result of two brief analogy-based demonstration lessons was also observed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 565–585, 2007.

[1]  Onno De Jong,et al.  Exploring the use of multiple analogical models when teaching and learning chemical equilibrium , 2005 .

[2]  Mei-Hung Chiu,et al.  Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies , 2005 .

[3]  Lynn D. Newton.  The occurrence of analogies in elementary school science books , 2003 .

[4]  D. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning , 2003 .

[5]  D. Heywood.  The Place of Analogies in Science Education , 2002 .

[6]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  How do Teachers and Textbook Writers Model Scientific Ideas for Students? , 2001 .

[7]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Fostering conceptual change by analogies—between Scylla and Charybdis. , 2001 .

[8]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[9]  Joan Parker,et al.  Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogic content knowledge in primary teachers' learning about forces , 2000 .

[10]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & Cognition.

[11]  Sherman K. Stein,et al.  Archimedes : What Did He Do Besides Cry Eureka? , 1999 .

[12]  Kim Pittman,et al.  Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? , 1999 .

[13]  T. V. D. Valk,et al.  The Lesson Preparation Method: a way of investigating pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge , 1999 .

[14]  G. Lakoff.  Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[15]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Learning from analogy‐enhanced science text , 1998 .

[16]  William E. Herman.  Promoting Pedagogical Reasoning as Preservice Teachers Analyze Case Vignettes , 1998 .

[17]  Lisa C. Castillo.  The Effect of Analogy Instruction on Young Children's Metaphor Comprehension. , 1998 .

[18]  Confronting the analogy: primary teachers exploring the usefulness of analogies in the teaching and learning of electricity , 1997 .

[19]  MARIE K. IDING,et al.  How analogies foster learning from science texts , 1997 .

[20]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Analogies in Biology Education: A Contentious Issue. , 1997 .

[21]  “Before teaching this I'd do a lot of reading” preparing primary student teachers to teach science , 1997 .

[22]  Edward Victor,et al.  Science for the Elementary and Middle School , 1996 .

[23]  Shawn Glynn.  Teaching with Analogies: Building on the Science Textbook (National Reading Research Center). , 1996 .

[24]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical reasoning ability , 1995 .

[25]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[26]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[27]  P. James Gaskell,et al.  Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1994 .

[28]  E. Wong,et al.  Understanding the generative capacity of analogies as a tool for explanation , 1993 .

[29]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  When analogy is perceived as such , 1993 .

[30]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Neural Principles of Memory and a Neural Theory of Analogical Insight. , 1993 .

[31]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The importance of analogy: A prelude to the special issue , 1993 .

[32]  Clive Sutton,et al.  Figuring Out a Scientific Understanding. , 1993 .

[33]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[34]  U. Goswami.  Analogical reasoning in children , 1993 .

[35]  Deborah Trumbull,et al.  University researchers' inchoate critiques-of science teaching: Implications for the content of preservice science teacher education , 1993 .

[36]  P. Thagard,et al.  Analogy, Explanation, and Education. , 1992 .

[37]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[38]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[39]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Explaining Science Concepts : A Teaching-With-Analogies Model , 1991 .

[40]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance , 1991 .

[41]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Using Analogs for Chemistry Problem Solving: Does it Increase Understanding? , 1990 .

[42]  Peggy J. Tilgner,et al.  Avoiding science in the elementary school , 1990 .

[43]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition , 1988 .

[44]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[46]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[47]  P. Jose.  Development of the Appreciation of Fables. , 1987 .

[48]  B. Plato,et al.  Early Socratic Dialogues , 1987 .

[49]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  The elementary level science methods course: Breeding ground of an apprehension toward science , 1983 .

[50]  G. D. Freier,et al.  A Demonstration Handbook for Physics , 1982 .

[51]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[52]  R. Dreistadt,et al.  An analysis of the use of analogies and metaphors in science. , 1968, The Journal of psychology.

[53]  R. Oppenheimer.  Analogy in science. , 1956 .

[54]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[55]  D. Harris,et al.  THE METAPHOR IN SCIENCE. , 1912, Science.