Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial

Background: The role of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in cardiogenic shock is still a subject of intense debate despite the neutral results of the IABP-SHOCK II trial (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II) with subsequent downgrading in international guidelines. So far, randomized data on the impact of IABP on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. Furthermore, only limited evidence is available on general long-term outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock treated by contemporary practice. Methods: The IABP-SHOCK II trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Between 2009 and 2012, 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction undergoing early revascularization were randomized to IABP versus control. Results: Long-term follow-up was performed 6.2 years (interquartile range 5.6–6.7) after initial randomization. Follow-up was completed for 591 of 600 patients (98.5%). Mortality was not different between the IABP and the control group (66.3% versus 67.0%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88–1.11; P=0.98). There were also no differences in recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, or rehospitalization for cardiac reasons (all P>0.05). Survivors’ quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol 5D questionnaire and the New York Heart Association class did not differ between groups. Conclusions: IABP has no effect on all-cause mortality at 6-year long-term follow-up. Mortality is still very high, with two thirds of patients with cardiogenic shock dying despite contemporary treatment with revascularization therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00491036.

[1]  Ahmed Elghanam,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2019, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[2]  H. Thiele,et al.  One‐Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[4]  H. Wienbergen,et al.  Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry , 2018, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[5]  J. Wald,et al.  Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States , 2018, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[6]  H. Thiele,et al.  PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  H. Thiele,et al.  Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  [2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure]. , 2016, Kardiologia polska.

[9]  J. Messenger,et al.  Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2015, Circulation.

[10]  E. Ohman,et al.  Management of cardiogenic shock. , 2015, European heart journal.

[11]  G. Schuler,et al.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[12]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[14]  R. Stables,et al.  Long-Term Mortality Data From the Balloon Pump–Assisted Coronary Intervention Study (BCIS-1): A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Elective Balloon Counterpulsation During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2012, Circulation.

[15]  Biykem Bozkurt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[16]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[17]  G. Schuler,et al.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Jennifer Taylor Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, European heart journal.

[19]  N. Danchin,et al.  Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. , 2012, European heart journal.

[20]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation , 2013 .

[21]  G. Schuler,et al.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial. , 2012, American heart journal.

[22]  K. Werdan,et al.  Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 Guideline. , 2012, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[23]  J. Haerting,et al.  Hemodynamic Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The Prospective, Randomized IABP Shock Trial , 2012, Shock.

[24]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[25]  R. Stables,et al.  Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[26]  S. Werns A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? , 2010 .

[27]  J. Gore,et al.  Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Perspective , 2009, Circulation.

[28]  J. Tijssen,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? , 2008, European heart journal.

[29]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Ten-Year Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, JAMA.

[31]  L. Shaw,et al.  Thrombolysis and Counterpulsation to Improve Survival in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Hypotension and Suspected Cardiogenic Shock or Heart Failure: Results of the TACTICS Trial , 2005, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[32]  W. Greiner,et al.  Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population , 2005, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[33]  H. White,et al.  One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. , 2001, JAMA.

[34]  H. S,et al.  Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .

[35]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  A Kantrowitz,et al.  Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. , 1968, JAMA.