Assessing the Efficacy of a Virtual Assistant in the Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation of Heart Failure and Ischemic Heart Disease Patients: Case-Control Study of Romanian Adult Patients

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality in Europe, with potentially more than 60 million deaths per year, with an age-standardized rate of morbidity-mortality higher in men than women, exceeding deaths from cancer. Heart attacks and strokes account for more than four out of every five CVD fatalities globally. After a patient overcomes an acute cardiovascular event, they are referred for rehabilitation to help them to restore most of their normal cardiac functions. One effective way to provide this activity regimen is via virtual models or telerehabilitation, where the patient can avail themselves of the rehabilitation services from the comfort of their homes at designated timings. Under the funding of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program, grant no 769807, a virtual rehabilitation assistant has been designed for elderly patients (vCare), with the overall objective of supporting recovery and an active life at home, enhancing patients’ quality of life, lowering disease-specific risk factors, and ensuring better adherence to a home rehabilitation program. In the vCare project, the Carol Davila University of Bucharest (UMFCD) was in charge of the heart failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) groups of patients. By creating a digital environment at patients’ homes, the vCare system’s effectiveness, use, and feasibility was evaluated. A total of 30 heart failure patients and 20 ischemic heart disease patients were included in the study. Despite the COVID-19 restrictions and a few technical difficulties, HF and IHD patients who performed cardiac rehabilitation using the vCare system had similar results compared to the ambulatory group, and better results compared to the control group.

[1]  A. Cordeiro,et al.  Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure Assisted By Telerehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2022, International journal of telerehabilitation.

[2]  W. Cubała,et al.  Commentary concerning treatment of depression in patients with heart failure according to 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. , 2022, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[3]  V. O'Carroll,et al.  The effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation in comparison to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes: A literature review , 2022, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  C. Andrei,et al.  Patient Perception When Transitioning from Classic to Remote Assisted Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2022, Diagnostics.

[5]  S. Grace,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East-Central Europe , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in Europe , 2021, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[7]  H. Du,et al.  Remote cardiac rehabilitation services and the digital divide: implications for elderly populations during the COVID19 pandemic , 2021, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  B. Levis,et al.  Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis , 2021, BMJ.

[9]  B. Dinesen,et al.  Effects of Telerehabilitation Interventions on Heart Failure Management (2015-2020): Scoping Review. , 2021, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[10]  P. Brubaker,et al.  How has technology been used to deliver cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic? An international cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals conducted by the BACPR , 2021, BMJ Open.

[11]  G. Pepera,et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs in the era of COVID-19: a critical review , 2021, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[12]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature , 2020, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Social Assistive Robots: Assessing the Impact of a Training Assistant Robot in Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2020, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[14]  R. Kirkwood,et al.  Effectiveness of exercises by telerehabilitation on pain, physical function and quality of life in people with physical disabilities: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials with GRADE recommendations , 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  Dominique Hansen,et al.  The future is now: a call for action for cardiac telerehabilitation in the COVID-19 pandemic from the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[16]  Paul Dendale,et al.  Use of cardiac telerehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium , 2020, Acta cardiologica.

[17]  A. Mattioli,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic: the effects of quarantine on cardiovascular risk , 2020, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[18]  A. Khera,et al.  Continuity of care and outpatient management for patients with and at high risk for cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scientific statement from the American Society for Preventive Cardiology , 2020, American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

[19]  J. Afilalo Evaluating and Treating Frailty in Cardiac Rehabilitation. , 2019, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[20]  Daniel E Forman,et al.  Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. , 2019, Circulation.

[21]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Conventional Rehabilitation Therapy Versus Telerehabilitation in Cardiac Patients: A Comparison of Motivation, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[22]  G. Barbati,et al.  Impact of ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcomes: a long-term follow-up study , 2018, European heart journal.

[23]  Yong Hwan Kim,et al.  Gender differences in home-based cardiac rehabilitation of post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients , 2019, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[24]  James R. Lewis,et al.  The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  N. Paik,et al.  Mobile Game-based Virtual Reality Program for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2018, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[26]  Panos Vardas,et al.  European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. , 2018, European heart journal.

[27]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[28]  Shin-Tsu Chang,et al.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation improves quality of life, aerobic capacity, and readmission rates in patients with chronic heart failure , 2018, Medicine.

[29]  Karin Coninx,et al.  The European Association of Preventive Cardiology Exercise Prescription in Everyday Practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool: A digital training and decision support system for optimized exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease. Concept, definitions and construction methodology , 2017, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[30]  R. Aguilar-Jiménez,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme of mixed surveillance in patients with ischemic heart disease at moderate cardiovascular risk: A randomised, controlled clinical trial , 2017, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[31]  D. Forman,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults. , 2016, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[32]  Gemma Navarro,et al.  The Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire: comparison of different factor structures , 2016, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[33]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[34]  Manuel Pérez Cota,et al.  Efficient Measurement of the User Experience of Interactive Products. How to use the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).Example: Spanish Language Version , 2013, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[35]  David Parkin,et al.  Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[36]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  Fan-Yun Pai,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems , 2011 .

[38]  C. Pomerleau,et al.  Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. , 1994, Addictive behaviors.