Taxonomy for Modeling Demand Response Resources

Author(s): Olsen, Daniel; Kiliccote, Sila; Sohn, Michael; Dunn, Laura; Piette, Mary, A | Abstract: Demand response resources are an important component of modern grid management strategies. Accurate characterizations of DR resources are needed to develop systems of optimally managed grid operations and to plan future investments in generation, transmission, and distribution. The DOE Demand Response and Energy Storage Integration Study (DRESIS) project researched the degree to which demand response (DR) and energy storage can provide grid flexibility and stability in the Western Interconnection. In this work, DR resources were integrated with traditional generators in grid forecasting tools, specifically a production cost model of the Western Interconnection. As part of this study, LBNL developed a modeling framework for characterizing resource availability and response attributes of DR resources consistent with the governing architecture of the simulation modeling platform. In this report, we identify and describe the following response attributes required to accurately characterize DR resources: allowable response frequency, maximum response duration, minimum time needed to achieve load changes, necessary pre- or re-charging of integrated energy storage, costs of enablement, magnitude of controlled resources, and alignment of availability. We describe a framework for modeling these response attributes, and apply this framework to characterize 13 DR resources including residential, commercial, and industrial end-uses. We group these end-uses into three broad categories based on their response capabilities, and define a taxonomy for classifying DR resources within these categories. The three categories of resources exhibit different capabilities and differ in value to the grid. Results from the production cost model of the Western Interconnection illustrate that minor differences in resource attributes can have significant impact on grid utilization of DR resources. The implications of these findings will be explored in future DR valuation studies.

[1]  Hideharu Sugihara,et al.  Effect of optimal spinning reserve requirement on system pollution emission considering reserve supplying demand response in the electricity market , 2011 .

[2]  Andrew Satchwell,et al.  Analytical Frameworks to Incorporate Demand Response in Long-term Resource Planning , 2014 .

[3]  Michael Starke,et al.  Assessment of Industrial Load for Demand Response across U.S. Regions of the Western Interconnect , 2013 .

[4]  William Gifford,et al.  Customer Impact Evaluation for the 2009 Southern California Edison Participating Load Pilot , 2010 .

[5]  Sila Kiliccote Northwest Open Automated Demand Response Technology Demonstration Project , 2010 .

[6]  Peter Cappers,et al.  Demand Response for Ancillary Services , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Peter Cappers,et al.  Demand Response and Energy Storage Integration Study , 2016 .

[8]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs , 2010 .

[9]  Andrew Satchwell Incorporating Demand Response into Western Interconnection Transmission Planning , 2014 .

[10]  F. Galiana,et al.  Demand-side reserve offers in joint energy/reserve electricity markets , 2003 .

[11]  Girish Ghatikar,et al.  Demand Response Opportunities and Enabling Technologies for Data Centers: Findings From Field Studies , 2012 .

[12]  T. K. Moore Today's sterilizer is not your father's water heater. , 2009, AORN journal.

[13]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Installation and Commissioning Automated Demand Response Systems , 2008 .

[14]  Hyung-Geun Kwag,et al.  Optimal combined scheduling of generation and demand response with demand resource constraints , 2012 .

[15]  Li Xiaolei,et al.  Using Dimmable Lighting for Regulation Capacity and Non-Spinning Reserves in the Ancillary Services Market. A Feasibility Study. , 2011 .

[16]  Hyung-Geun Kwag,et al.  Reliability modeling of demand response considering uncertainty of customer behavior , 2014 .

[17]  Peter Cappers,et al.  An assessment of market and policy barriers for demand response providing ancillary services in U.S. electricity markets , 2013 .

[18]  A. Lekov,et al.  Opportunities for Energy Efficiency and Automated Demand Response in Industrial Refrigerated Warehouses in California , 2009 .

[19]  Mary Ann Piette,et al.  Analysis of Open Automated Demand Response Deployments in California and Guidelines to Transition to Industry Standards , 2014 .

[20]  Nance E. Matson,et al.  Grid Integration of Aggregated Demand Response, Part 2: Modeling Demand Response in a Production Cost Model , 2013 .

[21]  Gary Marks Opportunities for Demand Response in California Agricultural Irrigation: A Scoping Study , 2013 .

[22]  S. Kiliccote Open Automated Demand Response Communications in Demand Response for Wholesale Ancillary Services , 2009 .

[23]  Peter Cappers,et al.  Market and Policy Barriers for Demand Response Providing Ancillary Services in U.S. Markets , 2014 .

[24]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Field Testing of Automated Demand Response for Integration of Renewable Resources in California's Ancillary Services Market for Regulation Products , 2013 .

[25]  Aimee McKane,et al.  Opportunities for Automated Demand Response in Wastewater Treatment Facilities in California - Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant Case Study , 2012 .