Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled “safe and just space” framework

Significance We have downscaled planetary boundaries and applied the “safe and just space for humanity” framework at the national scale, for the first time, creating a “barometer” for inclusive sustainable development for South Africa. The barometer presents the state and trajectory of a broad but manageable set of indicators for environmental and social priorities, and highlights the country’s proximity to environmental boundaries and the distance from eradication of social deprivation. This creates a monitoring and communication tool for national government for thinking in an integrated manner about environmental and social-development issues. Our case study provides insight into the challenges and complexities of developing indicators and targets for the proposed global Sustainable Development Goals that that are globally, regionally, and nationally relevant. Nations in the 21st century face a complex mix of environmental and social challenges, as highlighted by the on-going Sustainable Development Goals process. The “planetary boundaries” concept [Rockström J, et al. (2009) Nature 461(7263):472–475], and its extension through the addition of social well-being indicators to create a framework for “safe and just” inclusive sustainable development [Raworth K (2012) Nature Climate Change 2(4):225–226], have received considerable attention in science and policy circles. As the chief aim of this framework is to influence public policy, and this happens largely at the national level, we assess whether it can be used at the national scale, using South Africa as a test case. We developed a decision-based methodology for downscaling the framework and created a national “barometer” for South Africa, combining 20 indicators and boundaries for environmental stress and social deprivation. We find that it is possible to maintain the original design and concept of the framework while making it meaningful in the national context, raising new questions and identifying priority areas for action. Our results show that South Africa has exceeded its environmental boundaries for biodiversity loss, marine harvesting, freshwater use, and climate change, and social deprivation is most severe in the areas of safety, income, and employment. Trends since 1994 show improvement in nearly all social indicators, but progression toward or over boundaries for most environmental indicators. The barometer shows that achieving inclusive sustainable development in South Africa requires national and global action on multiple fronts, and careful consideration of the interplay between different environmental domains and development strategies.

[1]  N. Stafford Turbulent times , 2006, Nature.

[2]  C. V. Ginkel Eutrophication: Present reality and future challenges for South Africa , 2011 .

[3]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Well-being stories , 2009 .

[4]  Fetty Wijayanti,et al.  From the Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. , 2016, Journal of virus eradication.

[5]  Thomas M. Parris,et al.  Characterizing a sustainability transition: Goals, targets, trends, and driving forces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Rockström,et al.  Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.

[7]  François Molle,et al.  Water poverty indicators: conceptual problems and policy issues , 2003 .

[8]  Des Gasper,et al.  Sen's capability approach and Nussbaum's capabilities ethic , 1997 .

[9]  S. Running Ecology. A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere. , 2012, Science.

[10]  B. Wible Science for Sustainable Development , 2012, Science.

[11]  J. Nel,et al.  National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: An assessment of South Africa’s biodiversity and ecosystems. , 2012 .

[12]  S. Fredericks Justice in sustainability indicators and indexes , 2012 .

[13]  Matt Walpole,et al.  Developing ecosystem service indicators: Experiences and lessons learned from sub-global assessments and other initiatives , 2011 .

[14]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere , 2012, Nature.

[15]  S. Cornell On the System Properties of the Planetary Boundaries , 2012 .

[16]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[17]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Carole L. Crumley,et al.  The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship , 2011, AMBIO.

[19]  Kate Raworth,et al.  A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? , 2012 .

[20]  José Gabriel Palma,et al.  Homogeneous Middles vs. Heterogeneous Tails, and the End of the ‘Inverted‐U’: It's All About the Share of the Rich , 2011 .

[21]  J. Sachs From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals , 2012, The Lancet.

[22]  D. Moran,et al.  Measuring sustainable development - Nation by nation , 2008 .

[23]  W. Pitman Overview of water resource assessment in South Africa: current state and future challenges , 2011 .

[24]  R. Dorrington,et al.  RAPID MORTALITY SURVEILLANCE REPORT 2011 , 2012 .

[25]  C. Samper Planetary boundaries: Rethinking biodiversity , 2009 .

[26]  J. Dutoit The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[27]  Gisbert Glaser,et al.  Policy: Base sustainable development goals on science , 2012, Nature.

[28]  A. Hasan,et al.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development , 2007 .

[29]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Multiscale regime shifts and planetary boundaries. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  S. Feeny,et al.  Old challenges and new opportunities for the MDGs: now and beyond 2015 , 2011 .

[32]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..

[33]  E. Ostrom A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[34]  D. Raimondo The Red List of South African plants – A global first , 2011 .

[35]  M. Meadows,et al.  The nature, extent and causes of land degradation in South Africa: legacy of the past, lessons for the future? , 2002 .

[36]  E. Weiss United Nations Conference on Environment and Development , 1992, International Legal Materials.

[37]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability , 2010 .

[38]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet , 2012 .

[39]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[40]  B. Collen,et al.  National Red Listing Beyond the 2010 Target , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  G. Vince Living in the doughnut , 2012 .

[42]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[43]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Anticipating Critical Transitions , 2012, Science.

[44]  S. Lewis We must set planetary boundaries wisely , 2012, Nature.

[45]  David Molden,et al.  Planetary boundaries: The devil is in the detail , 2009 .

[46]  S. Kaveri,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth System , 2010 .

[47]  Björn Nykvist,et al.  National Environmental Performance on Planetary Boundaries , 2013 .

[48]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[49]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[50]  C. Folke,et al.  Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries : Emerging governance of climate change—ocean acidification—marine biodiversity , 2012 .

[51]  Soong Sup Lee World development indicators 2010 , 2010 .

[52]  T. Harpham,et al.  Environmental legislation and contamination: the gap between theory and reality in South Africa. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[53]  D. Avenell,et al.  The South African index of multiple deprivation 2001 at datazone level , 2009 .

[54]  S. Seitzinger,et al.  Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts , 2013 .

[55]  S. Bass Planetary boundaries: Keep off the grass , 2009 .

[56]  K. Malik,et al.  Human Development Report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World , 2013 .

[57]  R. Engelman State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible? , 2013 .

[58]  A Bridgwood,et al.  General Household Survey. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[59]  V. Dakos,et al.  Living dangerously on borrowed time during slow, unrecognized regime shifts. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Stuart White,et al.  Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security , 2011 .

[61]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A Measurable Planetary Boundary for the Biosphere , 2012, Science.

[62]  Karl-Heinz Erb,et al.  Changes in land use in South Africa between 1961 and 2006: an integrated socio-ecological analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework , 2012, Regional Environmental Change.

[63]  Amartya Sen Human Rights and Capabilities , 2005 .

[64]  F. Schoeman,et al.  South African National Land-Cover Change Map , 2013 .

[65]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  The Growing Human Footprint on Coastal and Open-Ocean Biogeochemistry , 2010, Science.

[66]  Session,et al.  Resolution Adopted By The General Assembly , 1984, International Legal Materials.

[67]  Botswana National development plan , 1968 .

[68]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  The ecological footprint: a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America , 2003 .

[69]  W. Schlesinger Planetary boundaries: Thresholds risk prolonged degradation , 2009 .

[70]  R. Scholes,et al.  Land-cover changes in South Africa 1911-1993 , 2002 .

[71]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The General Theory of Second Best , 1956 .

[72]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.