Transnational citation, technological diversity and small world in global nanotechnology patenting

Despite the extensive studies conducted in the field of nanotechnology based on US patent data, the choice of a single database may impede a wider view of this technology frontier. Based on patent data from the Derwent Innovation Index database that covers the data of 41 major patent offices, we review the development of nanotechnology patenting from the dimensions of patenting authority and technological classification. We find that a small number of countries dominating the technology have similar technological diversity in terms of nanotechnology patents. After the discussion and summary of the citation modes and citation rate curve, we construct the patent citation networks at the patent document level and discuss the distinctive transnational citation patterns. We then use Search Path Count Method to extract the technological trajectory, where we find very high selectiveness. In the final section of this paper, we discover the small world phenomenon in the citation networks, which is widely investigated in undirected networks such as co-authorship networks, but rarely touched in citation networks due to the limitations of the presumptions. We propose the reachable path length and citation clustering in the revised small world model for acyclic directed networks and provide the realistic meaning of the new measures.

[1]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[2]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[3]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[4]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge , 2007 .

[5]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Andrei Mogoutov,et al.  Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking , 2007 .

[7]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Examining the small world phenomenon in the patent citation network: a case study of the radio frequency identification (RFID) network , 2009, Scientometrics.

[8]  Theodore A. Khoury,et al.  Shared inventions and the evolution of capabilities: Examining the biotechnology industry , 2011 .

[9]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ , 2007 .

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Theories of Citation , 1998 .

[11]  Catherine A. Larson,et al.  Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[12]  S. Shane,et al.  Determinants of invention commercialization: an empirical examination of academically sourced inventions , 2007 .

[13]  J. Meredith,et al.  The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis , 2009 .

[14]  Cheng-Hsin Chiang,et al.  Network structure of innovation: can brokerage or closure predict patent quality? , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Comparing regional innovative capacities of PR China based on data analysis of the national patents , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[18]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[19]  Mark E. Welland,et al.  Trends in Nanotechnology , 2004 .

[20]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology , 2007, Scientometrics.

[21]  Chao-Chan Wu,et al.  Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display , 2009, Scientometrics.

[22]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[23]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China's nanotechnology , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[24]  Bob Stembridge International Patent Classification in Derwent databases , 1999 .

[25]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004) , 2007 .

[26]  Lionel Nesta,et al.  Patents Statistics, Knowledge Specialisation and the Organisation of Competencies , 2005 .

[27]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors , 2007, Scientometrics.

[28]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology , 2005 .

[29]  Martin Meyer,et al.  What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency , 2007, Scientometrics.

[30]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[32]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance , 1997, Scientometrics.

[35]  M.M.S. Karki,et al.  Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool , 1997 .

[36]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains , 2010 .

[37]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[38]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  L. A. Amaral,et al.  Small‐World Networks and Management Science Research: A Review , 2007 .

[40]  Can Huang,et al.  Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies , 2011 .

[41]  Raymond G. Koytcheff,et al.  Structure of the Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Instrumentation Literature , 2007 .

[42]  Daren Yu,et al.  Characterizing knowledge diffusion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[43]  Bethany S. Dohleman Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .

[44]  Zan Huang,et al.  Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field , 2003 .

[45]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[46]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Structure of the nanoscience and nanotechnology applications literature , 2008 .

[47]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[48]  M. McAleer,et al.  Nanotechnology strength indicators: international rankings based on US patents , 2003 .

[49]  Qingjun Zhao,et al.  International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2011, Scientometrics.