Exploring ERP post-implementation modifications and their influence on business process outcomes: a theory driven model

The objective of this research in progress paper is to develop a theory-driven model to categorise postimplementation modifications to ERP systems and to understand the relationship between the identified categories and business process outcomes that are generated as a result of the modifications. While ERP systems can improve the efficiency, effectiveness and flexibility of business processes, the relationship between these outcomes and post-implementation modifications is not understood adequately. The model proposed here provides a theoretical foundation for research into the impact of modifications on business process performance, and brings clarity to the definition of an ERP modification by developing a typology of modifications.

[1]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  An ERP-client benefit-oriented maintenance taxonomy , 2002, J. Syst. Softw..

[2]  Jacqueline L. Reck,et al.  Market Reaction to ERP Implementation Announcements , 2001, J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Harry Boer,et al.  ERP implementation: An integrated process of radical change and continuous learning , 2003 .

[5]  Peter B. Seddon.  Are ERP systems a source of competitive advantage , 2005 .

[6]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  How Organization Goals Affect Interorganization System Implementation Projects: Evidence and Implications , 2008 .

[7]  Oana Velcu,et al.  Exploring the effects of ERP systems on organizational performance: Evidence from Finnish companies , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[8]  Somnath Bhattacharya,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Market and Firm Level Factors Influencing ERP Systems Adoption and Post-Implementation System Enhancement Options , 2010 .

[9]  Robert C. Beatty,et al.  ERP II , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An exploratory study of the impacts of upgrading packaged software: a stakeholder perspective , 2011, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Pei-Chann Chang,et al.  Exploring the Links between Competitive Advantage and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Upgrade Decision: A Case Study Approach , 2009 .

[12]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  The First ERP Upgrade Project at DSW: Lessons Learned From Disillusion With Simplicity Expectations , 2006, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[13]  Hooshang M. Beheshti,et al.  Improving productivity and firm performance with enterprise resource planning , 2010, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[14]  James L. Worrell.  Running the ERP marathon: Enhancing ERP-business fit in the post-implementation phase , 2008 .

[15]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  The Role of Information Systems Resources in ERP Capability Building and Business Process Outcomes , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Meg Fryling,et al.  Estimating the impact of enterprise resource planning project management decisions on post-implementation maintenance costs: a case study using simulation modelling , 2010, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[18]  Sue Newell,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A Neglected Area , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Paul Jackson,et al.  Making the Case for Critical Realism: Examining the Implementation of Automated Performance Management Systems , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[20]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  The Impact of ERP Implementation on Business Process Outcomes: A Factor-Based Study , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Somnath Bhattacharya,et al.  Sustainability of ERPS performance outcomes: The role of post-implementation review quality , 2008, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Combining social shaping of technology and communicative action theory for understanding rhetorical closure in IT , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[23]  Han van Dissel,et al.  ERP System Migrations. , 2000 .

[24]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Maintaining Software May Help an Organization Learn , 2001 .

[25]  David L. Olson,et al.  CIOs' perspectives of critical success factors in ERP upgrade projects , 2007, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Careers, culture and ethics in a networked environment , 2004 .

[27]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Critical Realism in Information Systems Research , 2013, MIS Q..

[28]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation and Upgrade , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res..

[30]  Charlie C. Chen,et al.  Managing the full ERP life-cycle: Considerations of maintenance and support requirements and IT governance practice as integral elements of the formula for successful ERP adoption , 2010, Comput. Ind..

[31]  S. Dempsey,et al.  Justification of an Upgrade of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System – The Accountant’s Role , 2013 .

[32]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  An agency theory model of ERP implementation , 2004, SIGMIS CPR '04.

[33]  M. Shane Tomblin,et al.  Theory Development in Enterprise Systems and Organizational Learning , 2010, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[34]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Large packaged application software maintenance: a research framework , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[35]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Deciding to upgrade packaged software: a comparative case study of motives, contingencies and dependencies , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Norita B. Ahmad,et al.  Lessons Learned During a Decade of ERP Experience: A Case Study , 2009, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Severin V. Grabski,et al.  A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems , 2011, J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  ERP and application integration: Exploratory survey , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[39]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[40]  Somnath Bhattacharya,et al.  Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post-implementation changes , 2006, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[41]  A. Edmondson,et al.  From Organizational Learning to the Learning Organization , 1998 .

[42]  J. March.  The Future, Disposable Organizations and the Rigidities of Imagination , 1995 .

[43]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Seeking strategic advantage in the post-net era: viewing ERP systems from the resource-based perspective , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Celeste See Pui Ng.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Capabilities and Upgrade Decision , 2006, PACIS.

[45]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Impact of an ERP system’s capabilities upon the realisation of its business value: a resource-based perspective , 2012, Information Technology and Management.

[46]  David Gefen,et al.  What makes the competitive contribution of ERP strategic , 2008, DATB.

[47]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[48]  Amitava Dutta,et al.  A Process-Oriented Framework for Justifying Information Technology Projects in e-Business Environments , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[49]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Organizational Motivation and Interorganizational Systems Adoption Process: Empirical Evaluation in the Australian Automotive Industry , 2007, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[50]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Advancing Information Systems Evaluation (Research): A Critical Realist Approach , 2003 .

[51]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[52]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[53]  Thomas Kalling,et al.  ERP Systems and the Strategic Management Processes that Lead to Competitive Advantage , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[54]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Archetypes and the Logic of Management - How assumptions on ERP systems influence management actions , 2012 .

[55]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[56]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Past, Present and Future , 2007, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Celeste See Pui Ng,et al.  Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice a Decision Framework for Enterprise Resource Planning Maintenance and Upgrade: a Client Perspective , 2022 .

[58]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[59]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[60]  Jim Odhiambo Otieno,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems implementation and upgrade (a Kenyan study) , 2010 .