Sustainable Wastewater Management: Is it Possible to Regulate Micropollution in the Future by Learning from the Past? A Policy Analysis

This paper applies a policy analysis approach to the question of how to effectively regulate micropollution in a sustainable manner. Micropollution is a complex policy problem characterized by a huge number and diversity of chemical substances, as well as various entry paths into the aquatic environment. It challenges traditional water quality management by calling for new technologies in wastewater treatment and behavioral changes in industry, agriculture and civil society. In light of such challenges, the question arises as to how to regulate such a complex phenomenon to ensure water quality is maintained in the future? What can we learn from past experiences in water quality regulation? To answer these questions, policy analysis strongly focuses on the design and choice of policy instruments and the mix of such measures. In this paper, we review instruments commonly used in past water quality regulation. We evaluate their ability to respond to the characteristics of a more recent water quality problem, i.e., micropollution, in a sustainable way. This way, we develop a new framework that integrates both the problem dimension (i.e., causes and effects of a problem) as well as the sustainability dimension (e.g., long-term, cross-sectoral and multi-level) to assess which policy instruments are best suited to regulate micropollution. We thus conclude that sustainability criteria help to identify an appropriate instrument mix of end-of-pipe and source-directed measures to reduce aquatic micropollution.

[1]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[2]  Andrew C Johnson,et al.  Cytotoxic drugs in drinking water: A prediction and risk assessment exercise for the thames catchment in the United Kingdom , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Carrots, sticks & sermons : policy instruments & their evaluation , 1998 .

[4]  F. Sager Governance and Coercion , 2009 .

[5]  John P Sumpter,et al.  Drug residues and endocrine disruptors in drinking water: risk for humans? , 2011, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[6]  C. Helling,et al.  IMPACT OF FOUR PESTICIDES ON THE GROWTH AND METABOLIC ACTIVITIES OF TWO PHOTOSYNTHETIC ALGAE , 2002, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.

[7]  M. Bemelmans-videc Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. , 1998 .

[8]  S. Richardson Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  J. Keller,et al.  Biofiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent: effective removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and reduction of toxicity. , 2011, Water research.

[10]  J. Hollender,et al.  Mikroverunreinigungen - Beurteilungskonzept für organische Spurenstoffe aus kommunalem Abwasser , 2011 .

[11]  Christa S. McArdell,et al.  Polar Organic Micropollutants In The Water Cycle , 2008 .

[12]  F. Sacher,et al.  Pharmaceutical residues in the river Rhine--results of a one-decade monitoring programme. , 2008, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[13]  T. Backhaus,et al.  Low-Level Exposure to Multiple Chemicals: Reason for Human Health Concerns? , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[15]  Terri Damstra,et al.  Global assessment of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors , 2002 .

[16]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Some economic considerations on the importance of proactive integrated coastal zone management , 1996 .

[17]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[18]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems , 2006, Science.

[19]  V. Cunningham,et al.  Human health risk assessment from the presence of human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[20]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Choice of policy instruments: confronting the deductive and the interactive approaches , 2005 .

[21]  Stephen R. Smith,et al.  Review of 'emerging' organic contaminants in biosolids and assessment of international research priorities for the agricultural use of biosolids. , 2011, Environment international.

[22]  D. McGonigle,et al.  Towards a more strategic approach to research to support catchment-based policy approaches to mitigate agricultural water pollution: A UK case-study , 2012 .

[23]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context , 2005 .

[24]  K. Ingold,et al.  Water Resources Management: What Should Be Integrated? , 2012, Science.

[25]  Guy Peters,et al.  The Problem of Policy Problems , 2005 .

[26]  Andreas Kortenkamp,et al.  Do cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs discharged into rivers pose a risk to the environment and human health? An overview and UK case study , 2008 .

[27]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance , 2005 .

[28]  A. Jordan,et al.  The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? , 2005 .

[29]  Martin Bach,et al.  Trend of herbicide loads in the river Rhine and its tributaries , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[30]  G. Bruce Doern,et al.  Canadian public policy: Ideas, structure, process , 1983 .

[31]  J. Hinkel “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface , 2011 .

[32]  R. Watson,et al.  Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Sedlak,et al.  Peer reviewed: understanding microcontaminants in recycled water. , 2000, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Florence Metz Addressing micropollution by linking problem characteristics to policy instruments , 2013 .

[35]  C. Valiente Moro,et al.  Comparative effects of the herbicides chlortoluron and mesotrione on freshwater microalgae , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[36]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[37]  D. Schorkopf,et al.  Impact of ozonation on ecotoxicity and endocrine activity of tertiary treated wastewater effluent. , 2012, Water research.

[38]  Joel P Bercu,et al.  Human health risk assessments for three neuropharmaceutical compounds in surface waters. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[39]  N. Carter The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy , 2001 .

[40]  Xiu-Sheng Miao,et al.  Carbamazepine and its metabolites in wastewater and in biosolids in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  N. Zeitouni,et al.  Controlling Groundwater Pollution from Agricultural Non-point Sources: an Overview of Policy Instruments , 2001 .