Understanding Therapists’ Needs and Attitudes Towards Robotic Support. The Roboterapia Project

Robots have been recently used as valuable therapeutic devices in numerous studies (especially with children with developmental needs), but their role as more general support for therapists is less well studied. However, as robots become better integrated in therapeutic environments, they will also influence therapists; and if robots are designed correctly, they could positively influence therapists’ well-being. Understanding how robots could be used in such a way is especially important as therapists of autistic children (and therapists of mentally disabled people in general) have one of the highest risks of workplace burnout. This paper describes a series of studies conducted to understand therapists’ attitudes towards robotic support and to discover what is most needed in such devices; this paper also describes an experimental study of the feasibility of robots playing one of those roles. Through observational studies and a series of ten meetings, with a group of seven therapists of autism, a list of possible roles was created. In a larger questionnaire based study, therapists gave a ranking to various robot roles and functions (a child’s behaviour analyser and support in critical/dangerous situations were given the highest priority). Therapists also stated that they expect robots to help them in the workplace, help prepare documentation and make their work more systematic. In a Wizard-of-Oz type experimental study, a robot was used to play a role of “emotional mirror” with seven therapist-child pairs. Study participants stated that a robot was acceptable and was not disturbing, although most did not find it particularly useful. Our conclusions indicate that therapists want robots to play a larger role than just a therapeutic device, and such roles can be added to robots without disturbing sessions with clients.

[1]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Incorporating a robot into an autism therapy team , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Michal Tadeusz Kaszczuk,et al.  The IVO Software Blizzard Challenge 2009 Entry: Improving IVONA Text-To-Speech , 2009 .

[3]  Emilia I. Barakova,et al.  End-user programming architecture facilitates the uptake of robots in social therapies , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How Social Robots Will Help Us to Diagnose, Treat, and Understand Autism , 2005, ISRR.

[5]  Goro Obinata,et al.  Which Robot Features Can Stimulate Better Responses from Children with Autism in Robot-Assisted Therapy?: , 2012 .

[6]  Lauren M. Schmitt,et al.  The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review. , 2012, Research in autism spectrum disorders.

[7]  B. Robins,et al.  Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism : A case study in robot-human interaction , 2004 .

[8]  Mayer Alvo,et al.  Exploratory Analysis of Ranking Data , 2014 .

[9]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Ono, a DIY open source platform for social robotics , 2014 .

[10]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Toward Therapist-in-the-Loop Assistive Robotics for Children with Autism and Specific Language Impairment , 2009 .

[11]  Gregor Wolbring,et al.  Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[12]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Dry Your Eyes: Examining the Roles of Robots for Childcare Applications , 2010 .

[13]  Igor Zubrycki,et al.  Designing an interactive device for sensory therapy , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  G. Mesibov,et al.  Commitment to Philosophy, Teacher Efficacy, and Burnout Among Teachers of Children with Autism , 2003, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.