Global-to-local representation and visualization of molecular surfaces using deformable models

Macromolecules such as proteins and enzymes are responsible for most of cellular functionality. Many molecular interactions, such as protein-protein interactions or protein-ligand binding, occur at what can be defined as the molecular surface. The topology of the molecular surface is often complex, containing various geometric features such as clefts, cavities, tunnels, and flat regions. These geometric features coupled with non-geometric physicochemical properties influence surface-based molecular interactions. Consequently analysis of molecular surfaces is crucial in elucidating structure-property relationships of molecules. In this paper we propose a method for visualizing a molecular surface in a manner that preserves and elucidates salient features. The method involves mapping of a molecular surface to a standard spherical coordinate system. The ability to map arbitrary molecular surfaces to a standard coordinate system aids in comparison of surface features across different molecules. The mapping is accomplished by enclosing the molecular surface by a sphere, and then iteratively deforming the sphere until it converges by wrapping the entire molecular surface. This allows a one-to-one relationship to be established between points on the molecular surface and points on the surface of the sphere. The presence of discontinuities such as tunnels in the molecular surface can be identified by detecting collision between patches of the deforming sphere. Subsequently, the deformable surface is restored back to the sphere, retaining the mapping. Features and properties defined at the molecular surface are then mapped and visualized in the standard spherical coordinate system. The proposed approach has several key advantages. First, it allows a global-to-local visualization of molecular surfaces. Second, it facilitates comparison of specific features as well as collection of features within and across molecules by mapping them to a common coordinate system. Third, the method allows visualization of both geometric and non-geometric surface properties. Fourth, specific molecular characteristics can be visualized individually or in combination on-demand. Finally, and crucially the advantages offered by the proposed visualization do not involve simplification of the surface characteristics thereby ensuring that no loss of potentially important information occurs.

[1]  M. Schroeder,et al.  LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.

[2]  R. Laskowski SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[3]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Structure‐based prediction of DNA‐binding sites on proteins Using the empirical preference of electrostatic potential and the shape of molecular surfaces , 2004, Proteins.

[4]  Bin Li,et al.  Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion , 2008, Proteins.

[5]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[7]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  SURFACE: a database of protein surface regions for functional annotation , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  A dynamic finite element surface model for segmentation and tracking in multidimensional medical images with application to cardiac 4D image analysis. , 1995, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[10]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  Software extensions to UCSF chimera for interactive visualization of large molecular assemblies. , 2005, Structure.

[11]  G. Klebe,et al.  A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Rahul Singh,et al.  Surface similarity-based molecular query-retrieval , 2007, BMC Cell Biology.

[13]  James F. Blinn,et al.  Simulation of wrinkled surfaces , 1978, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Michel F Sanner,et al.  A component-based software environment for visualizing large macromolecular assemblies. , 2005, Structure.

[15]  A Godzik,et al.  Surface map comparison: studying function diversity of homologous proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  H. Edelsbrunner,et al.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Janusz M Bujnicki,et al.  SURF’s UP! — Protein classification by surface comparisons , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[20]  Jie Liang,et al.  Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Michael Gleicher,et al.  Molecular Surface Abstraction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.