The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity

In a study using event-related brain potentials, we show that the current characterization of the P600 component as an indicator of revision processes (reanalysis and repair) in sentence comprehension must be extended to include the recognition of syntactic ambiguity. By comparing the processing of ambiguous and unambiguous sentence constituents in German, we show that the P600 is elicited when our language processing system has syntactic alternatives at a certain item given in the input string. That the P600 is sensitive to syntactic ambiguity adds crucial evidence to current debates in psycholinguistic modelling, as the results clearly favour parallel models of syntactic processing which assume that ambiguity is recognized and costly.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  J. D. Saddy,et al.  Symbolic dynamics of event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Falsifying Serial and Parallel Parsing Models: Empirical Conundrums and An Overlooked Paradigm , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[7]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[8]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[9]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[10]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[11]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  German Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[12]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Edward Gibson,et al.  A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .

[15]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[16]  Paul Griffith Gorrell,et al.  STUDIES OF HUMAN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING: RANKED-PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL MODELS , 1987 .