Supporting global health goals with information and communications technology

ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to critically assess the possible roles of information and communications technology (ICT) in supporting global health goals. This is done by considering privilege and connectibility. In short, ICT can contribute by providing health information via four different kinds of access, each with its own history and prospective future. All four are analyzed here, in two perspectives: business-as-usual and disruptive. Health data analytics is difficult since the digital representation of past, current, and future health information is lacking. The flow of analytics that may prove beneficial to the individual and not just meet abstract population-level goals or ambitions is analyzed in detail. Sensemaking is also needed, to meet the minimum requirement of making prospective future services understandable to policymakers. Drivers as well as barriers for areas in which policy decisions have the potential to drive positive developments for meeting the Sustainable Development Goals are identified.

[1]  K. Weick.  ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .

[2]  Richard G Baraniuk,et al.  More Is Less: Signal Processing and the Data Deluge , 2011, Science.

[3]  Baki Cakici,et al.  Detecting the Visible: The Discursive Construction of Health Threats in a Syndromic Surveillance System Design , 2014 .

[4]  H. Soininen,et al.  The CAIDE Dementia Risk Score App: The development of an evidence-based mobile application to predict the risk of dementia , 2015, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[5]  David L. Buckeridge,et al.  Ontology-centered syndromic surveillance for bioterrorism , 2005, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[6]  M. Marmot,et al.  Importance of monitoring health inequalities , 2013, BMJ.

[7]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights from Weick (1988) , 2010 .

[8]  Baki Cakici.  The Informed Gaze: On the Implications of ICT-Based Surveillance , 2013 .

[9]  A. Reingold,et al.  If syndromic surveillance is the answer, what is the question? , 2003, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[10]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Big data meets public health , 2014, Science.

[11]  Magnus Boman.  Commentary: the joy of mesh , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  S. Murray,et al.  ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges , 2008, Health policy and planning.

[13]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[14]  Christian Guttmann,et al.  Syndromic surveillance in the United Arab Emirates , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT).

[15]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  The cost structure of sensemaking , 1993, INTERCHI.

[16]  M. Foucault,et al.  Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison , 1993 .

[17]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease , 2007, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[18]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Who Were Where When? On the Use of Social Collective Intelligence in Computational Epidemiology , 2014 .

[19]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs , 2000 .